feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Langes Sites

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

March 28, 2006

When is an asterisk insufficient in advertising?

When an advertiser needs to disclose terms and conditions in a print advertisement to avoid it being misleading, the usual method is to put an asterisk next to the claim being qualified and linking it to small print at the bottom of the ad.

But ASIC has now expressed the view that (in respect of financial services ads at least ) when the claim being qualified is made in the headline, an asterisk is inadequate.

BankWest’s advertising campaign for the BankWest Lite MasterCard referred to an interest rate
of 8.99 per cent per annum without disclosing adequately or prominently
enough that the rate excluded cash advances, which attract an interest
rate of 19.99 per cent per annum.

After being queried by ASIC, BankWest has agreed to add the specific statement
‘excludes cash advances’ to its headline claims regarding the 8.99 per
cent per annum interest rate following discussions with ASIC.

ASIC has announced that in giving effect to these changes, BankWest will:

  • cease its existing television campaign;
  • amend all relevant print marketing material and remove existing print material from circulation and display; and
  • amend its Lite Mastercard website and all web-based advertising.

ASIC’s Executive Director, Consumer Protection, Mr
Greg Tanzer said it was ASIC’s view that when a headline claim is made
about an interest rate (or fee or charge), any exclusions or
qualifications to the headline claim must be contained within the
headline claim itself. If not, such exclusions or qualifications must
be very clearly or prominently noted.

Posted 28th March 2006 by David Jacobson in Financial Services, Trade Practices

State of the Private Health Funds Report

The Private Health Insurance Ombudsman, Mr John Powlay, has published
the second annual “State of the Health Funds Report”, providing information on the comparative performance and service delivery of
private health insurance funds, focussing on complaints.

Mr Powlay reported that there has been an overall decline in the number of complaints received by the Ombusdman’s office. However, the number of complaints requiring investigation has increased.

In his report, the Ombudsman expressed particular concerns about consumer’s rights to clear information, restrictions on cover for life threatening conditions and changes to portability and benefit limitation periods.

The report identifies the number of complaints lodged against each fund and provides case studies.

Posted 28th March 2006 by David Jacobson in Compliance

March 27, 2006

Workplace laws

ComLaw has issued a consolidated version of the Workplace
Relations Act 1996
 including the recent Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005. The Act commences on 27 March 2006.

The new Workplace Relations Regulations 2006 are also available.

Posted 27th March 2006 by David Jacobson in Compliance

Insurance broker disputes

Insurance Broker Disputes Limited (IBDL) has announced that from July, the Banking and Financial Services Ombudsman (BFSO) and IBDL will share a case management system,
operated by BFSO. IBDL handles complaints and helps resolve problems between
insurance brokers and other financial services providers (other than
insurance companies) and their clients. The limit
for complaints will be $100,000 an event, including disputes over business
insurance cover.

Posted 27th March 2006 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

March 24, 2006

APRA releases draft harmonised outsourcing standard



The
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has issued, for
consultation, a Discussion Paper, accompanied by draft prudential
standards and a prudential practice guide
, on managing risks from
outsourcing. The standards apply a harmonised approach to authorised
deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), general insurers and life insurers.

The
package represents a principles-based approach detailing APRA’s minimum
requirements for managing risks from outsourcing but leaving the way
open for institutions to develop their outsourcing policy that meets
the principles.

The draft prudential
standards are largely based on the requirements currently in place for
ADIs but introduce greater flexibility in the approach to intra-group
outsourcing and deal explicitly with outsourcing to an offshore party
(’offshoring’).

APRA
Chairman, Dr John Laker, said the risks arising from outsourcing
arrangements are common across the industries regulated by APRA and are
best addressed through a harmonised approach.

The draft prudential standards
and prudential practice guide will be finalised in the second quarter
of 2006 and will take effect on 1 October 2006.

Posted 24th March 2006 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

ASIC calculators

ASIC has launched its new ‘term allocated pension’
calculator to help make retirement planning easier, and also announced
upgrades to its very popular and powerful super calculator.

Posted 24th March 2006 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

March 23, 2006

The Australian Guidelines for Electronic Commerce

The Australian Guidelines for Electronic Commerce, were released by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 17 March 2006.
More

Posted 23rd March 2006 by David Jacobson in Compliance

March 22, 2006

Is APRA the Goldilocks of regulatory capital?

In a recent speech Charles Littrell, APRA Executive General Manager Policy Research and Statistics Division, suggested that APRA was like Goldilocks as far as regulatory capital for banks and insurers was concerned: not too much, not too little but "just right", but its version of "just right" was probably more than what shareholders thought was right as APRA looked at it from the point of view of depositors and policyholders.

Littrell identified some trends:

1. Better use of surplus capital: instead of risking it on a risky "strategic initiative" it is being returned to shareholders

2. the increasing complexity and divergence of regulatory equity from accounting equity.

3.improving the quality of capital, and particularly quality of equity, rather than increasing the absolute quantity of regulatory capital. He thought the net effect of this was neutral but that the capital ratios of Australian banks would be in the lower ranks compared to international peers even though their asset quality was amongst the best.

Posted 22nd March 2006 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

March 21, 2006

ASIC reviews GE Money’s life insurance sales practices

GE Money has given ASIC an enforceable undertaking to change its life insurance sales practices and compensate affected customers.

The undertaking is in response to ASIC’s investigation into insurance advice provided by Avco Financial Services which GE Money acquired in 1999. ASIC reviewed over 150 customers’ files. Following the review, ASIC was concerned about a number of GE Money insurance sales practices, including the following:

    * GE Money had a practice of advising customers to take out Consumer Credit Insurance life cover (which would pay out the GE Money loan on their death) as well as a term life policy (which would pay a lump sum on death to the customer’s estate) when it would have been cheaper for the customer to take out one term life policy to achieve the same result;

    * GE Money routinely advised customers, who were single and had no dependants, to take out life insurance to pay out the loan to GE Money when it was not clear that it was in the customer’s interests to do so; and

    * GE Money might have recommended that customers take out more life insurance than they needed because GE Money:

          o routinely did not take into account the level of customers’ superannuation savings;
          o sometimes did not take into account life insurance cover that was part of customers’ superannuation; and
          o sometimes recommended a higher level of insurance cover than the customer records suggested they needed.

    * Where an existing customer sought further credit, GE Money’s practice was to provide a new loan package (incorporating the existing loan balance) and replace the existing CCI life policy with a new one. These customers were not told about the potential problems with this approach, including that if a health condition arose before the issue of the replacement policy, they might not be able to make a claim.

GE Money’s undertakings include that GE Money will:

   1. stop recommending that customers take both CCI life and term life policies;
   2. stop advising single customers with no dependants to take out life insurance to pay the GE Money loan, unless there is a clear benefit to the customer;
   3. undertake a review, both internally and by an independent compliance expert, of its sales practices; and
   4. offer compensation to affected consumers.

Posted 21st March 2006 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

March 18, 2006

Consumer protection in financial services

Jeffrey Lucy the Chairman of Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has explained ASIC’s role as a consumer protection regulator in an address to Consumer Affairs Victoria’s Third National Consumer Congress.

He said that ASIC’s role differed from ACCC’s as ASIC currently licences most providers of financial services and products including financial advisers, superannuation trustees, general and life insurance companies, banks and other intermediaries such as insurance and stockbrokers. The main omission from ASIC’s licensing regime under the Corporations Act is credit providers and credit intermediaries.

ASIC’s responsibilities under the ASIC Act focus on the same types of conduct that the ACCC has responsibility for under the Trade Practices Act. But ASIC’s role is limited to preventing and taking action in relation to unconscionable, misleading or deceptive conduct connected to financial services and products. ASIC’s jurisdiction under the ASIC Act is broader than under the Corporations Act as it does extend to credit.

Posted 18th March 2006 by David Jacobson in Financial Services
Older Posts »