feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

May 24, 2006

Shareholder meetings procedure changes

Since 2002 the Government has been considering removing the ’100 member rule’, which requires companies to hold potentially expensive special general meetings at the request of only 100 shareholders. The change may occur this year.

In April 2006 the Exposure Draft Corporations Amendment Bill (No 2) 2006  (pdf) was released; the time for submissions has now closed. The Bill will implement reforms to improve rules for shareholder meetings announced by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, the Hon Chris Pearce MP, in December 2005.

Currently Section 249D of the Corporations Act allows company members with 5 per cent of the votes that can be cast at the general meeting or 100 members who are entitled to vote at the general meeting to requisition a general meeting at the expense of the company. Section 249(1) will be repealed and replaced with a section only requiring a meeting to be held on the request of members with at least 5% of the votes that may be cast at the general meeting.

The Government will also proceed with reforms to require proxy holders to vote in accordance with shareholder instructions, and to facilitate electronic circulation of resolutions and members statements.
The Government will not proceed with proposals to reduce the threshold requirements for shareholders to propose members’ resolutions and members’ statements.

The requirements relating to the disclosure of proxy votes before a vote is taken at a meeting of shareholders(subsection 250J(1A)) will be repealed.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 24th May 2006 by David Jacobson in Corporate Governance