feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

January 31, 2007

Shareholder actions

The High Court, by a 6-1 majority, in Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic; ING Investment Management LLC v Margaretic [2007] HCA 1 has dismissed the appeals from the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Sons of Gwalia Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v Margaretic [2006] FCAFC 17 which affirmed that an on-market purchaser (as opposed to a subscribing shareholder) of shares can in a winding up prove for damages against the company for the misrepresentation which induced the purchase and so have claims in damages or for compensation for contraventions of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 1041H of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) or s 12DA of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth).

The High Court held that the right of a shareholder to prove for damages against the company for the misrepresentation was not governed by
s 563A of the Act which postpones all members’ rights on a winding up until all creditors have been paid.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 31st January 2007 by David Jacobson in Corporate Governance, Corporations Act