feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

November 29, 2007

ACCC succeeds in price-fixing and resale price maintenance prosecutions

The ACCC has been successful in 2 recent prosecutions:

In Australian Competition & Consumer
Commission v Australian Abalone Pty Ltd
[2007] FCA 1834 penalties totalling $927,500 were imposed on individuals and companies involved in a Victorian abalone cartel.

The ACCC alleged that under the arrangement the parties would not
supply a processor customer unless that processor paid a premium on top
of an average ‘beach’ price (market price) and was a processor
nominated by Australian Abalone Pty Ltd, a corporate vehicle created to
market the catch by the quota holder and others.

Justice Weinberg of the Federal Court in Melbourne found, that the
conduct contravened the primary boycott and price fixing provisions of
the Act ( ss 45(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and
45(2)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Trade Practices Act 1974) and the Victorian Competition Code.

In ACCC v TEAC the Federal Court of Australia imposed penalties totalling $190,000
on TEAC Australia Pty Ltd and its National Sales Manager, Mr Warren
Allison, for engaging in resale price maintenance in contravention of section 48 of the Trade Practices Act in relation to conduct that sought to stop an independent retailer of
electronic products from advertising prices below the ‘go price’
specified by TEAC. (ACCC Media Release).

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 29th November 2007 by David Jacobson in Trade Practices