feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

April 30, 2008

Legislation to remove same-sex discrimination

The Attorney-General Robert McClelland has announced that the government will introduce legislation to remove same-sex discrimination from a wide range of
Commonwealth laws .

This reform follows the 2007 report of HREOC, Same-Sex: Same Entitlements,
which focussed on financial and work-related legislation.  On coming to
office, the Rudd Government commissioned an audit of Commonwealth laws,
which identified other areas of discrimination.

Areas where discrimination will be removed include tax,
superannuation, social security, health, aged care, veterans’
entitlements, workers’ compensation, employment entitlements, and other
areas of Commonwealth administration.

The Rudd Government will begin introducing legislation in the Winter
Sittings of Parliament. Most reforms will commence soon after the
legislation is passed. In some areas (such as social security, tax and
veterans’ affairs), the reforms will be phased-in to allow time for
couples to adjust their finances, and for administrative arrangements
to be implemented. All of the changes are expected to be implemented
by mid-2009.

The changes will not alter
marriage laws.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 30th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Business Planning, Financial Services, Insurance, Workplace

Regulation of Direct Offshore Foreign Insurers – Draft Regulations

Treasury has released draft regulations setting out the details of the exemption provisions for licensing of foreign insurers announced on 8 April.

Submissions close on 19 May 2008.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 30th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Insurance

April 29, 2008

APRA prohibits “covered bonds” by ADI’s.

APRA has confirmed its prohibition of covered bonds.

Covered bonds are secured ADI funding structures whereby an ADI issues debt instruments in conjunction with a cover pool of the ADI’s assets, which are held by the ADI or in a separate vehicle for the benefit of bond investors in the event the ADI is unable to meet its obligations on the debt instruments.

APRA’s objection to covered bond structures is that, in substance, they subordinate the interests of depositors of ADIs to the interests of the covered bond holders.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 29th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

Corporate Governance In Today’s Volatile Market Condition

The Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law’s speech on Corporate Governance In Today’s Volatile Market Condition summarises the government’s caution about further regulation as a response to the sub-prime crisis:

"on the whole, our robust financial system has coped extremely well
with the recent global pressures. And our market regulators have been
doing a solid job in difficult circumstances.

… But I can
assure you that I am well aware of the need for caution before we
introduce any new regulation in this area.

We must look beyond immediate events and preoccupations. We must
consider the medium-term risks, opportunities, and vulnerabilities that
confront corporate law.

I am committed to pursuing reform of the regulatory and corporate
governance framework. Reform that is comprehensive, effective, and —
above all — sustainable.

The speech discusses:

  • disclosure requirements for  equity derivatives
  • short selling and securities lending
  • directors’ conduct and obligations to their companies
  • reforms to corporate offences, sanctions and personal liability for directors
  • financial services consumer protection
  • reform of regulation of credit-related financial  services
  • financial reporting
  • self managed superannuation funds

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 29th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Corporate Governance, Corporations Act, Financial Services

ACCC report on anti-competitive practices by health funds or providers

The ACCC has released its 2006-2007 report to the Senate of ‘any anti-competitive practices by health funds or providerswhich reduce the extent of health cover for consumers and increase their out-of-pocket medical and other expenses’.

The report covers:

  • Portability of health fund membership
  • contracts and contract negotiation between hospitals and health funds
  • the availability of useful consumer information on private health insurance products and health services

The Report noted a decrease in the overall complaints and inquiries received by the ACCC and the Private Health Insurance Ombudsman.

It has a useful overview of Australia’s health fund market (although this has since changed with the public listing of NIB and the prposed demutualisation of MBF).

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 29th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Insurance

Takeovers Panel rejects claim in respect of bank share securities

In the matter of BioProspect Limited 02 [2008] ATP 6 the Takeovers Panel refused to declare unacceptable circumstances under the takeover provisions of the Corporations Act. The ANZ Bank had failed to lodge any substantial holder notice in relation to its interest in BioProspect arising from its appointment of receivers to Opes Prime.

The Panel did not consider that the Application, on its face, came within section 657A.

However, the Bank subsequently lodged a substantial shareholder notice and gave undertakings to the Panel (among other things) not to:

  1. trade BioProspect securities other than in the ordinary course of trading on the ASX and
  2. sell BioProspect securities comprising an amount greater than 5%
    of the issued capital of BioProspect over any three consecutive trading
    days.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 29th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

April 28, 2008

Predatory pricing and other Trade Practices Act small business amendments

As foreshadowed earlier this year, the Rudd Government has announced a package of measures to further amend the Trade Practices Act 1974 including the predatory pricing amendments passed late last year

The Government’s amendments will:

  • ensure that victims of predatory pricing will not need to
    prove that the predator has the ability to recoup losses after
    participating in an anticompetitive below cost pricing strategy.
  • clarify
    the meaning of the term ‘take advantage’ in section 46 in response to
    concerns raised by businesses and the ACCC that the present meaning of
    that term has prevented section 46 from capturing anticompetitive
    behaviour.
  • remove the  uncertainty that has
    arisen following the ‘two track’ process for predatory pricing that
    developed under the previous government. The ACCC has said that the
    dual track process has “caused considerable confusion” because they
    focus on the “fundamentally different concepts” of market power and
    market share.

The reforms will also strengthen the role of the ACCC by enabling it
to fully investigate suspected breaches of the law by enhancing its
information gathering powers under section 155 of the Act  .

The Government will also extend the reach
of the ACCC by repealing the $10 million threshold that applies to actions under section
51AC of the Act for unconscionable conduct in business transactions,
with duplicate amendments made to the equivalent provisions of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (‘the ASIC Act’) which apply to transactions involving financial services.

The Government will amend the Act to require at least one ACCC Deputy Chairperson to have knowledge of, or experience in, small business matters.

The jurisdiction of the Federal Magistrates Court will be extended to include matters arising under section 46 rather than requiring prosecution in the Federal Court, in appropriate
circumstances.

The Government wants to have its amendments to the Trade Practices
Act passed by parliament by August.

UPDATE: Speech by Chris Bowen. Assistant Treasurer, Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Financial Services, Trade Practices

April 27, 2008

.au domain name registration and transfers policy

A new policy on transfers of .au domain names will take effect on 1 June 2008.

auDA (the Australian Domain Name Administrator) has announced that key features of the new policy are as follows:

  • it will not be allowable to register a domain name for the sole purpose of resale or transfer to a third party
  • registrants
    will not be able to transfer their domain name for the first 6 months
    after the initial registration (this does not apply to domain names
    that have been renewed or previously transferred)
  • after 6
    months, registrants will be able to offer their domain name for
    sale/transfer by any means (eg. by listing the domain name for sale on
    a domain brokerage website, advertising the domain name for sale in a
    newspaper, or contacting a prospective buyer directly)
  • the new registrant must comply with normal eligibility and allocation rules:
    registrant transfers will be processed by the registrar of record using a standard transfer form, and the registrar may charge a transfer fee
  • parties
    to a transfer will be asked to disclose the sale method and price, on a
    voluntary and confidential basis, so that auDA may collect aggregated
    statistical data to improve access to market information for buyers and
    sellers.

The current Transfers (Change of Registrant) Policy (2004-03) remains in force until 1 June.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 27th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Intellectual Property

April 24, 2008

Annual Review of Regulatory Burdens on Business – Manufacturing & Distributive Trades

The Productivity Commission has published an issues paper to assist those preparing submissions to its
review of regulatory burdens on manufacturing and the distributive
trades.

Schedule B lists the areas of concern in its last review. These include:

  • Food
  • Therapeutic products and medical devices
  • Pharmacy
  • Plastics and chemicals
  • Superannuation
  • OHS
  • Workers compensation
  • Skills mobility and licensing
  • Immigration
  • Employment reporting
  • Taxation
  • Environment

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 24th April 2008 by David Jacobson in Business Planning

April 23, 2008

ASIC reports on the implementation of the new debenture regulatory measures

ASIC has released a report (Report 127: Debentures – Improving disclosure for retail investors) presenting
the findings of a review into disclosures made by each of the unlisted,
unrated debenture issuers against the new disclosure regime.

The disclosures are based on benchmarks on issues ranging from equity capital levels to enhanced transparency of valuations.

Each issuer has, or is in the process of, providing
all its investors with a specific report for their investment on how it
meets the benchmarks in ASIC’s  Regulatory Guide 69 Debentures – Improving Disclosure for Retail Investors on an ‘if not, why not’
basis.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 23rd April 2008 by David Jacobson in Financial Services