feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

September 28, 2008

Austrac issues Public Legal Interpretation on suspect transactions and suspicious matter reports

Austrac Public Legal Interpretation 6 deals with suspect transactions and suspicious matter reports.

The PLI sets out AUSTRAC’s views on the provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) and the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (FTR Act) as they relate to:
• the obligation to report suspect transactions within the meaning of section 16 of the FTR Act
• the obligation to report suspicious matters within the meaning of section 41 of the AML/CTF Act
• the general prohibition on use of these reports as evidence.

The PLI discusses the ‘Reasonable grounds to suspect’ test with reference to decided cases.

It concludes that a cash dealer who suspects the relevant matters on reasonable grounds which are later found to be mistaken, has an obligation to report to AUSTRAC. Paragraph 16(5)(d) FTR Act provides immunity from any action, suit or proceeding for mistakenly reporting matters.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th September 2008 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering