feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

August 8, 2009

ASIC consultation paper on over-the-counter derivatives

ASIC has released a consultation paper, Client money relating to dealing in OTC derivatives (CP 114), which contains proposals to improve disclosure by a financial services licensee dealing in OTC (over the counter) derivatives . The paper also clarifies how ASIC expects licensees to comply with the client money provisions in the Corporations Act.


Client money is paid to a financial service licensee for either a financial service or a financial product held by a client and can comprise margin deposits and other money that a client has paid to or left with a licensee, such as an OTC derivatives provider. However, the client agreements of many financial services licensees dealing in derivatives can contain a broad authorisation for the licensee to use client money for any purpose.


ASIC is seeking stakeholder views on the best ways for licensees to advise their clients how their money is held, the counterparty risks and the licensee’s policies for the use of client money.


ASIC recommends retail investors trading in CFDs or other derivatives find out from their issuer how they look after client money, including seeking the issuer’s position on:

  • whether client money is held separate from the issuer’s funds as required by law;
  • if their money can be used to meet trading obligations of other clients,
  • whether the issuer can use client money for their own purposes; and
  • where and how the issuer has disclosed its client money policies to the investor.

Submissions on the consultation paper close on 18 September 2009.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 8th August 2009 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act, Financial Services

August 7, 2009

Unsolicited credit cards and debit cards

ASIC has released Regulatory Guide 201 Unsolicited credit cards and debit cards (RG 201).


RG 201 clarifies ASIC’s interpretation of the scope of s12DL of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, which prohibits a person from sending unsolicited credit cards and debits cards to consumers.


The guide sets out ASIC’s view that the exceptions to this prohibition only allow the sending out of a credit card or debit card in response to a written request by the consumer or that is effectively the same as, or equivalent to, an existing card used by the consumer and would not place the consumer in a different position with respect to use of the card. An example is where a card provider sends new cards with the same features to cardholders whose existing cards are close to expiry, or where the new card has new security features.


ASIC recognises that product development and innovations by card providers may result in some circumstances where the application of s12DL is not clear. If card providers consider that it is not clear whether a particular card distribution would be permitted by s12DL, they may apply to ASIC for a no-action letter.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 7th August 2009 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

August 6, 2009

New edition of IFSA Blue Book

The Investment and Financial Services Association has published a new edition of its Blue Book on Corporate Governance.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 6th August 2009 by David Jacobson in Corporate Governance

Changes to rules for foreign investment in Australia

The Treasurer has announced reforms to Australia’s foreign investment rules.


The Government will:

  • Replace the four current lowest thresholds for private business investment with a single threshold of 15 per cent in a business worth $219 million. This means private foreign investment in Australian businesses below $219 million can proceed without review.
  • Index the new unified threshold on 1 January every year to keep pace with inflation and to prevent foreign investment screening from becoming more restrictive over time.
  • Abolish the existing requirement that private investors notify the Government when establishing a new business in Australia valued above $10 million.

The threshold of $953 million (indexed) for United States investment in non-sensitive sectors will remain.


The Government aims to introduce amending regulation in September 2009.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 6th August 2009 by David Jacobson in Business Planning

Disability Discrimination amendment

ComLaw has issued an updated consolidated Disability Discrimination Act 1992 containing recent amendments.


Key amendments to the Disability Discrimination Act are those that:

  • make explicit that refusal to make reasonable adjustments for people with disability may also amount to discrimination
  • make the defence of unjustifiable hardship available in relation to all unlawful discrimination on the ground of disability, except harassment and victimization
  • clarify matters to be considered when determining unjustifiable hardship
  • clarify that the onus of proving unjustifiable hardship falls on the person claiming it
  • make clear that the definition of disability includes genetic predisposition to a disability and behaviour that is a symptom or manifestation of a disability
  • replace the ‘proportionality test‘ in the definition of indirect discrimination with the requirement to prove that the condition or requirement imposed has the effect of disadvantaging people with the disability of the aggrieved person
  • shift the onus of proving the reasonableness of a requirement or condition in the context of indirect discrimination from the person with disability to the responden

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 6th August 2009 by David Jacobson in Workplace

APRA alleges victimisation under section 68 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act

APRA has made a criminal complaint that a former chief executive officer of the Queensland Retailers and Shopkeepers Association (QRTSA), victimised two directors of a superannuation trustee company.


APRA alleges that by terminating the employment of a QRTSA employee and terminating the engagement of the auditor of QRTSA, both of whom were also trustee directors of a superannuation fund linked to QRTSA, the accused committed acts of victimisation contrary to section 68 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (the SIS Act).


APRA alleges that by terminating their employment, the accused caused both individuals to suffer a financial detriment for simply carrying out their legal obligation in their capacity as trustee directors to act in the best interests of fund members.


The case has been adjourned to 18 September 2009 at the Brisbane Magistrates Court. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is prosecuting the matter.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 6th August 2009 by David Jacobson in Superannuation

August 4, 2009

ASIC relief applications report December 2008 to March 2009

ASIC has released a report outlining recent decisions on applications for relief from the corporate finance, financial services and managed investment provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 between 1 December 2008 and 31 March 2009.


The report covers relief applications for:

  • licensing;
  • disclosure;
  • managed investments;
  • mergers and acquisitions;
  • conduct;
  • short selling;
  • other areas.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 4th August 2009 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act, Financial Services

August 3, 2009

Austrac changes supervisory strategy

AUSTRAC has released its supervision strategy for 2009-10 outlining its approach to supervising compliance across the different industry sectors it regulates under Australia's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws as it moves from a start-up stage to "business as usual."

AUSTRAC has changed its approach because the staggered implementation of the AML/CTF Act is now complete and all its obligations are now in effect and the Minister's Policy (Civil Penalty Orders) Principles 2006, which placed conditions on the circumstances in which AUSTRAC would take enforcement action, no longer apply to many obligations.

AUSTRAC describes its new approach to supervision as a spectrum:

At a lower end are activities such as mailouts, e-newsletters and articles in industry magazines. These activities can achieve a high level of coverage across a large number of reporting entities, but are not tailored to individual entities. They are designed to improve entities’ general understanding of their obligations but are less effective at improving levels of compliance than more intensive forms of supervision.

In the middle of the spectrum are themed reviews and monitoring of transaction and compliance reports. These activities are more resource intensive but still apply to a broad range of reporting entities.

On-site assessments are the highest level of supervisory intervention. These activities are tailored to individual reporting entities and consequently have a more direct impact on improving compliance. Where these activities do not result in improved compliance, they are likely to result in direct enforcement action.

The strategy outlines the different approaches AUSTRAC will take to:

  • Banks and other lenders
  • Non-banking financial services
  • Gambling and bullion
  • Money service businesses

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 3rd August 2009 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering

August 2, 2009

Langes+ combined feed now available

If you haven’t looked at our website lately you won’t be aware that you can either subscribe to our various newsfeeds individually or to one new feed that combines all our feeds so that you get all our latest updates in the same place. You can either subscribe in a reader or by email. Have a look here.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 2nd August 2009 by David Jacobson in Weblogs

August 1, 2009

CAMAC market integrity report

The Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC) has released its report Aspects of market integrity .

The report deals with a number of practices that have the potential to damage the integrity of the market and investor confidence. These practices are:

  • directors’ interests in the securities of listed companies and margin lending
  • ‘blackout’ trading by company directors
  • spreading of false and misleading information ("rumour mongering")
  • disclosure of information in the briefing of analysts.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 1st August 2009 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act
« Newer Posts