feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

March 28, 2010

Financial Claims Scheme disclosure regulations

The Corporations Amendment Regulations 2010 (No. 2) will require authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADI’s) and general insurers to provide information relating to the Financial Claims Scheme (FCS) in Product Disclosure Statements.

The Financial Claims Scheme currently provides a free guarantee of deposits up to and including $1 million if an ADI becomes insolvent.

The Regulations will require ADIs and general insurers to disclose to account holders and policy holders in their PDSs relating to the FCS.

To maintain the PDS exemption for a basic deposit product; or a facility for making non-cash payments that is related to a basic deposit product or a traveller’s cheque, an ADI must disclose:
(i) the account holder may be entitled to payment under the financial claims scheme; and
(ii) access to the scheme is subject to a limit for each depositor; and
(iii) information about the financial claims scheme can be obtained from the APRA website at http://www.apra.gov.au and the APRA hotline on 1300 13 10 60.

General insurers must disclose that a statement that:
(i) the person entitled to claim under insurance cover under a protected policy may be entitled to payment under the financial claims scheme; and
(ii) access to the scheme is subject to eligibility criteria.

The disclosure requirements will commence for both general insurers and ADIs on 12 October 2011.

The Banking Amendment Regulations 2010 (No. 1) will ensure that a statutory manager can be appointed under the Banking Act 1959, notwithstanding the existence of external support arrangements such as the Government’s guarantee of deposits.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

Implementing new technology and new products: compliance risks

Changing your technology or altering existing products or introducing new products without proper planning can lead to compliance, marketing and financial disasters.

Before you make such changes you need to carry out a risk assessment to identify the compliance risks.

You need to ensure that the way in which decisions are made and the way such projects are implemented take compliance into account.

Even small software or product changes have risks.

Poor product knowledge combined with lack of understanding of regulatory requirements can also lead to a breach.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission V Wizard Mortgage Corporation Limited [2002] FCA 1317 considered an existing advertisement for a loan product which had been legally cleared but had been changed by the marketing head by adding in an interest rate (there was no rate before). However the product was not available at that rate. The Federal Court agreed with the ACCC that the ad was misleading and deceptive.

In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Audi Australia Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1990, the Federal Court made orders against Audi relating to its misleading advertising that the Audi Q7 3.6 SE motor vehicle had 7 seats as a standard feature at the standard price when in fact the standard seating for the Audi Q7 3.6 SE was 5 seats.

In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Limited [2004] FCA 987 the Federal Court decided that Telstra’s $0 mobile phone advertising was misleading and deceptive after analysing Telstra’s mobile phone plans.

In other cases lenders have committed credit code breaches by making supposedly minor software changes.
(more…)

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Compliance

March 22, 2010

Super System Review Phase 2 Report

The Super System Review has released SuperStream: Bringing the Back Office of Super into the 21st Century, a preliminary report focused on improving the operations and efficiency of the superannuation system.

To address these problems, the Review Panel proposes a package of measures which include:

  • improving the quality of data when members enter the system using industry-wide standards;
  • better use of technology, including ‘straight-through processing’ (ie without human intervention);
  • e-commerce solutions to replace paper;
  • extending the use of the tax file number as a primary identifier throughout the system;
  • easier consolidation of multiple member accounts; and
  • eliminating redundant processes, leading to simpler rollovers and consolidations.

The final report will be delivered to the Government by 30 June 2010.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 22nd March 2010 by David Jacobson in Superannuation

March 19, 2010

Australian Consumer Law Stage 2

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Bill (No. 2) 2010 has been introduced into Parliament.

The Bill represents stage 2 of amendments to the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TP Act) as part of a plan to create a single national consumer law for Australia, including a national product safety law. (Part 1 was passed earlier this week and will start on 1 January 2011:see here)

The Bill changes the name of the TP Act to the “Competition and Consumer Act 2010″.

The Bill’s changes include:

• incorporating the fair trading and consumer protection provisions of the TP Act into the ACL, including unfair contract terms and provisions implementing enhanced enforcement powers, penalties and redress options;
• creating a national legislative scheme for consumer product safety, to replace the existing Commonwealth, State and Territory regulatory schemes;
• creating a national legislative scheme for statutory consumer guarantees, to replace the existing Commonwealth and State and Territory legislation concerning implied conditions and warranties in consumer transactions; and
• augmenting the fair trading and consumer protection provisions of the TP Act with changes drawn from existing provisions of the consumer laws of the States and Territories.

The Senate Economics Legislation Committee has a new inquiry into the Bill.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 19th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Consumer Law, Trade Practices

APRA supervision of conglomerate groups

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released a discussion paper containing proposals on supervising conglomerate groups. These are groups with APRA‑regulated entities that have material operations in more than one APRA‑regulated industry and/or have material unregulated entities.

The Level 3 framework contains proposals to ensure that a conglomerate group holds adequate capital to protect the APRA‑regulated entities from potential contagion and other risks within the group. The framework also contains proposals on a range of principles‑based risk management and governance standards that will apply to the parent company of the Level 3 group.

Submissions on the Level 3 proposals are invited by 18 June 2010. Following this initial consultation, APRA will release draft prudential standards and reporting standards to implement the Level 3 framework. These standards will also be subject to public consultation.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 19th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

March 17, 2010

Unfair Terms in Insurance Contracts

The Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Bowen MP, has released an options paper relating to unfair terms included in insurance contracts.

The paper discusses the nature and scope of the problem, the adequacy of existing regulation and identifying and assess options to remedy the problem.

The options include extending the generic provisions of the Australian Consumer Law, and making other reforms to the Insurance Contracts Act 1984.

In its 2009 inquiry by the Senate Economics and Legislation Committee into the Australian Consumer Law Bill (passed today), one issue that was considered was that section 15 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (IC Act) would operate to prevent some or all of the unfair terms provisions proposed to be inserted in the ASIC Act (which mirror those in the ACL in respect of financial services) applying to terms in insurance contracts.

The paper examines the current carve-out under section 15 of the Insurance Contracts Act for insurance contracts from the operation of the unfair contracts terms provisions of the ASIC Act.

The closing date for submissions is 30 April 2010.

The Government has also introduced the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2010 into the House of Representatives.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 17th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Consumer Law, Insurance, Trade Practices

Australian Consumer Law passed

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Bill 2009 has been passed by the Senate, with amendments.

The national unfair contract terms law will not commence before 1 July 2010.

UPDATE 19 March: The House of Representatives has accepted the Senate amendments. The Act is awaiting Royal Assent.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 17th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Trade Practices

Austrac intepretation of agency

Austrac has issued Public Legal Interpretation 10 (PLI 10) Agency and the AML/CTF Act.

As the AML/CTF Act does not define an ‘agent’ or an ‘agency’ arrangement, Austrac issued this interpretation to set out its views on the principles of agency under this Act.

The interpretation includes the common law principles of agency; agency for the purposes of customer identification and the identification of agents of customers who receive designated services from reporting entities; and the implications of agency on reporting obligations.

PLI No. 6 ‘Suspicious matter and suspect transactions reports’, originally published on 26 September 2008, has been re-published to reflect AUSTRAC’s views on the principles of agency as they affect the reporting of suspicious matter reports.

AUSTRAC intends to republish PLI No. 3 ‘Registration as a provider of registrable designated remittance services’ to reflect legislative amendments in the Crimes Legislation (Serious and Organised Crime) Act (No. 2) 2010 which took effect on 20 February 2010. This republished PLI will also reflect AUSTRAC’s views on the principles of agency as they apply to designated remittance arrangements.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 17th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering

March 15, 2010

ASIC share purchase plan relief

ASIC has released changes to Class Order [CO 09/425], which provides prospectus and product disclosure statement relief for share and interest purchase plans.

Under the changes, investors holding shares through structures such as investor-directed portfolio services and superannuation master trusts, or who hold shares through structures involving two or more levels of custodians, will now be able to participate in share purchase plans.

Regulatory Guide 125 Share purchase plans has been updated to reflect the changes to Class Order [CO 09/425].

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 15th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act

Trustee companies licensing requirements

ASIC has released Consultation Paper 132 Trustee companies: Financial requirement and conduct obligations (CP 132) seeking public comment on the financial requirements and other conduct obligations for trustee companies that provide traditional trustee company services (traditional services), such as acting in deceased estates and under powers of attorney.

Under recent amendments, the provision of traditional services by trustee companies will be regulated as a financial service under the Corporations Act and will be brought under the supervision of ASIC. Revised draft regulations under the Corporations Act for trustee companies were recently released for further public comment.

ASIC will also be consulting in the future on the dispute resolution requirements for trustee companies .

Those trustee companies providing traditional services which currently hold an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence must vary their licence to include the provision of traditional services within six months of the regulations commencing.

Treasury is currently consulting on transitional arrangements for those trustee companies currently providing traditional services that do not hold an AFS licence.

Submissions on the proposals contained in the consultation paper close on Wednesday 7 April 2010.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 15th March 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act, Financial Services