feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

March 7, 2010

Government responds to unconscionable conduct and franchising report

The Government has announced it will amend the Trade Practices Act to clarify the unconscionable conduct provisions of the Trade Practices Act.

The changes are in response to an expert panel report entitled Strengthening statutory unconscionable conduct and the Franchising Code of Conduct.

The report recommended that the Government should consider harmonising or unifying sections 51AB and 51AC of the Trade Practices Act and include interpretative principles, as an aid to interpretation of the provisions, to assist the courts in interpreting the provisions, stakeholders in understanding them and regulators in enforcing them.

Increased new penalties for contravention of the statutory unconscionable conduct provisions (up to $1.1 million for companies and $220,000 for individuals) are in the Australian Consumer Law Bill which is currently before Parliament.

The report also considered whether the Franchising Code of Conduct should be amended to deal with certain franchisor practices, including unilateral variations by franchisors, requirements for capital expenditure, consent to business sales and confidentiality requirements.

The report recommended that a short, simple, ‘Plain English’ document should be developed, to be provided to prospective franchisees before they are psychologically, financially and legally committed to entering a franchise agreement. This short document would be a ready reference to the nature of the franchise relationship.

The report also suggested the provisions of the TPA may provide remedies where appropriate, for example, where unilateral variations of franchise agreements by franchisors constitutes unconscionable conduct.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 7th March 2010 by admin in Financial Services, Trade Practices

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.