feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

April 21, 2010

Super System Review report: MySuper universal superannuation

The Super System Review has released MySuper: Optimising Australian superannuation. This preliminary report provides more detail on ‘MySuper’ which is the new name for a universal product concept.

Some of the proposed features of MySuper include:

  • A ban on trailing commissions;
  • No contribution fees;
  • A new duty on trustees to manage the overall cost to members;
  • A default post-retirement product;
  • Trustee duties focused entirely on looking after the member.

MySuper would not be a separate default fund. It is designed to be a simple, cost‐effective product with a diversified portfolio of investments for the vast majority of Australian workers (shown to be above 80 per cent of members) who are invested in the default option in their current fund.

It would not prevent Australians from electing to have a fund that offers more choices and options, or want to manage their own super in a self-managed super fund (SMSF).

It is probable that a number of the changes proposed to apply to MySuper – such as the prohibitions on contribution fees and trailing commissions and the requirement to renew advice arrangements every 12 months – will also be recommended to apply in other superannuation sectors, including to SMSFs.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 21st April 2010 by David Jacobson in Superannuation

April 16, 2010

Government response on executive remuneration

The Government has responded to the Productivity Commission’s (PC’s) final report on Australia’s director and executive remuneration framework.

The Government supports 16 of the PC’s 17 recommendations, including the “two strikes” proposal, and has decided to further strengthen several of the recommendations by expanding their scope and enforceability. See the table of responses here.

Legislation giving effect to the reforms will be introduced this year, following public consultation on an exposure draft.

The Government will also consider an additional proposal, not identified by the PC, to clawback bonuses paid to directors and executives in the event of a material misstatement in the company’s financial statements. A discussion paper will be released in coming months on the proposal to clawback bonuses paid to directors and executives in the event of a material misstatement of a company’s financial statements.

This proposal is aimed at ensuring that, to the extent that pay packets are inflated by incorrect information, that money is returned to shareholders.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 16th April 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporate Governance, Corporations Act

Australian Consumer Law commences

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Bill (No. 1) 2010 received Assent on 14 April 2010 and commenced on 15 April, other than for the unfair contract terms provisions which will commence on 1 July 2010.

UPDATE: Download the Act here.

The ACL gives the ACCC new enforcement powers to protect consumers, including the ability to seek or issue:

  • civil monetary penalties;
  • banning orders;
  • substantiation notices;
  • infringement notices;
  • refunds for consumers, and
  • public warnings.

Under the changes the ACCC can seek financial penalties of up to $1.1 million for corporations and $220,000 for individuals in civil cases for unconscionable conduct, pyramid selling and sections of the law dealing with false or misleading conduct.

The ACCC will be able to deal with ‘repeat or serious offenders’ in cases involving unconscionable conduct, and breaches of various consumer protection and product safety provisions by seeking court orders banning them from managing corporations.

In cases involving misleading conduct, the ACCC will now be able to issue “substantiation notices” to require traders to justify claims they make about products they promote. Examples could include was/now advertising and claims about food, health, environmental impact and business opportunities.

Where the ACCC has reasonable grounds, it may now issue an infringement notice in cases of suspected unconscionable conduct, some false or misleading conduct, pyramid selling and various product safety provisions.

Infringement notice penalties for false or misleading, unconscionable conduct, pyramid selling and breaches of product safety provisions are $6,600 for corporations and $1,320 for individuals.

Financial services
As ASIC has jurisdiction over consumer protection relating to financial products and services under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act, the ACL also amends the ASIC Act to give ASIC similar powers to the ACCC.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 16th April 2010 by David Jacobson in Consumer Law, Financial Services, Trade Practices

April 15, 2010

Personal property securities draft regulations and transition schedule

The PPS Regulations: Exposure Draft and Commentary have been released for public consultation.

The PPS Regulations cover:

  • which interests are within the scope of the PPS Act (and those that are out of scope);
  • the interaction between the enforcement provisions in the Act and the National Consumer Credit legislation, and
  • matters relating to the PPS Register (including access to and suspension of the Register, the information required to effect a registration, and how grantors and secured parties are to be identified in a registration).

The Exposure Draft of the PPS Regulations takes into account amendments proposed by the PPS (Corporations and Other Amendments) Bill 2010.

The due date for submissions is 4 June 2010.

The Attorney-General’s Department has also released an overview of the major milestones in the PPS Reform Program up to the scheduled implementation time of May 2011.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 15th April 2010 by David Jacobson in National Credit Code, Personal Property Securities

April 14, 2010

AML ongoing customer due diligence:proposed changes

In response to issues raised by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in regard to Chapter 15 of the AML/CTF Rules on ongoing customer due diligence, particularly in relation to perceived discretionary action which a reporting entity may undertake in high money laundering and terrorism financing risk situations, AUSTRAC has issued draft amendments to Chapter 15 for comment.

The proposed changes specify the action a reporting entity must undertake in regard to the identified ML/TF risk or suspicion.

A public consultation period is open from 13 April 2010 to 30 April 2010.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 14th April 2010 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering

April 11, 2010

What does your directors’ indemnity cover?

In Rickus v Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Limited [2010] FCAFC 16, the Federal Court of Australia Full Court allowed an appeal from a Federal Court decision that a director’s deed of indemnity only related to costs involved in third party claims, not costs in respect of disputes with the company of which he was a director.

The Full Court considered the terms of the deed, company’s Constitution and section 199A of the Corporations Act and decided that the appellant (who was the company’s former chairman) was entitled to indemnity pursuant to the Deed of Indemnity in the circumstances of the present case in respect of legal costs incurred by him in defending and resisting the Trustee’s proceedings and in resisting the Trustee’s claims before those proceedings were commenced.

If you are a company director do you know what your deed says? As deeds of indemnity are, like insurance policies, only looked at after an event occurs, we recommend a regular review to ensure they remain appropriate to your needs.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 11th April 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporate Governance, Corporations Act

Applying international financial reforms locally

In Reform of global banking regulation: Balancing national and international interests, Wayne Byres, Executive General Manager, Diversified Institutions Division, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, explains how APRA decides whether international banking reforms will be imposed in Australia or whether they should be modfied or not adopted at all, depending on our national interest.

In discussing this topic, he makes it clear that the Basel II capital adequacy framework will not be changed.

APRA recently wrote to locally incorporated general insurers and authorised non-operating holding companies under the Insurance Act 1973 in relation to the application of the December 2009 Basel proposals on regulatory capital requirements to Australian general insurers. It noted that APRA has sought to maintain a broadly consistent approach to the definition of capital for general insurers and authorised deposit-taking institutions.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 11th April 2010 by David Jacobson in Financial Services, Insurance

April 7, 2010

ACCC draft guide to unfair contract terms

The ACCC has released for comment a draft publication Australian Consumer Law: A guide to unfair contract terms which provides information on the types of contracts and contract terms which may be affected by the new Australian Consumer Law’s unfair contract terms (UCT) provisions.

The ACCC has announced that the UCT provisions will commence on 1 July 2010 and that comments on the draft guide close on 12 April.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 7th April 2010 by David Jacobson in Consumer Law, Trade Practices

April 6, 2010

Checking your advertising and promotions

Once you’ve developed a new product or changes to an existing product (discussed here) , you need to review your advertising and method of promotion.

This means looking at both the content of the ad as well as where you place it. Laws and codes affect both aspects of advertising. And there may be further special rules that apply depending on the type of product or service.

Download our general checklist for an overview of the clearance process.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 6th April 2010 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Marketing

April 1, 2010

ATO guidance on acquisitions by SMSF’s

The Australian Taxation Office published a new ruling, SMSFR2010/1 on 25 February 2010 that explains the Commissioner’s views on the application of superannuation laws to the acquisition of an asset by a self-managed superannuation fund (“SMSF”) from a related party. The ruling replaces a previous draft ruling published on 2 April 2008.

Under superannuation law, a trustee or investment manager of a SMSF is prohibited from intentionally acquiring assets (other than money) from a related party of the SMSF, unless an exception applies. There are various exceptions which allow a trustee or investment manager to accept money or to acquire listed securities, business real property, certain in-house assets and certain assets specifically excluded from being in-house assets.

The Ruling explains certain requirements of the exceptions. It also clarifies that a trustee or investment manager accepts money from a related party if the substance of the transaction is to directly transfer funds held by the related party to the SMSF.

The Ruling attempts to define the scope of the term ‘acquire an asset’ including characterising what is acquired and the acceptance of money by a trustee or investment manager. It includes guidance on characterising what is acquired and considers the performance of a service and the acquisition of rights arising under a contract – for example, an option agreement.

For more information contact Katrina Nitschke.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 1st April 2010 by David Jacobson in Superannuation
« Newer Posts