feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

June 30, 2010

Super System Review update

The Super System Review Panel delivered its final report to the Government on 30 June 2010.

The Government will consider the report and will make its own decision concerning the timing of its release and the response to the recommendations made in the report.

A recent speech by the Review Chair, Jeremy Cooper, outlined the history of the review and the principles that guided it.

Mr Cooper indicated that most of the solutions that the Review will recommend are governance-oriented with quantifiable financial benefits.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 30th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Financial Services, Superannuation

Reforms to GST on financial supplies

Assistant Treasurer, Senator Nick Sherry, has released a consultation paper on reforms to the goods and services tax (GST) financial supply provisions.

The consultation paper provides further information on the following changes announced in the 2010-11 Budget:

  • increasing the financial acquisitions threshold (FAT) input tax credit test from $50,000 to $150,000;
  • make hire purchase fully taxable;
  • allow full input tax credits upfront for small businesses accounting on a cash basis when they enter into hire purchase;
  • excluding bank deposit accounts from the current special rules for borrowings;
  • expanding the range of expenses qualifying for a reduced input tax credit (RITC); and
  • clarifying the language and relationship between the concepts of guarantees and indemnities.

The changes will apply from 1 July 2012.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 30th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Financial Services, Tax

The AUSTRAC typologies and case studies report 2010

The AUSTRAC typologies and case studies report 2010 has been published.

It includes 31 case studies illustrating how legitimate Australian banking, gambling and remittance services have been misused to commit money laundering and other serious offences. It also lists indicators of potential money laundering/terrorism financing activity.

The report has sections on terrorism financing, current and emerging threats, and suspicious matter reports.

It is a useful training tool.

The analysis of case studies found that money laundering and fraud were equally prevalent, and represented the two most commonly occurring offence types. Fraud and money laundering combined constituted more than half (52 per cent) of all the offences identified in the case studies. The next most commonly identified offences were the importation of drugs (13 per cent), drug trafficking (8 per cent), structuring of financial transactions (8 per cent) and tax evasion (6 per cent).

The three most common types of designated services used to launder the proceeds of crime were account and deposit-taking services (used in 39 per cent of case studies), remittance services (14 per cent) and electronic funds transfers (12 per cent).

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 30th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering

June 29, 2010

Misleading descriptions in super investment advertising

APRA has written to trustees of APRA-regulated super funds offering “good practice guidance” on the labelling of investment options offered by superannuation funds.

To avoid confusion on the part of fund members by the use of “labels” such as “balanced”, “conservative” or “growth” and to help properly compare investment performance, APRA has suggested, pending more detailed guidance, that investment strategies be described by clearly stating what the expected frequency of negative returns of that strategy is over a 20 year period.

APRA is not, currently, suggesting guidance on the risk level appropriate for labels such as “conservative”, “balanced” or “growth” but it says that it expects trustees to “have access to robust data, systems and processes which substantiate the decisions to categorise investment strategies”.

APRA has also indicated that it is envisaged that Regulatory Guidance will be issued by ASIC in the first year of transition to the shorter PDS requirements under the Corporations Amendment Regulations 2010 No. 5.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 29th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Financial Services, Superannuation

June 28, 2010

Regulation of mortgage exit fees

ASIC has released Consultation Paper 135 Mortgage early exit fees: Unconscionable fees and unfair contract terms (CP 135) which contains its proposed guidance for compliance with provisions in the National Credit Code and Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (ASIC Act) that apply to setting the price of and explaining mortgage early exit fees.

Under the National Credit Code (Schedule 1 of the NCCP Act, sections 78 and 79), early exit fees which are unconscionable can be annulled or reduced by a court. Under the Australian Consumer Law, which amended the ASIC Act, an unfair term requiring an early exit fee to be paid can be declared void (Section 12BF). ASIC also has a number of new enforcement powers under the new consumer law provisions in the ASIC Act.

ASIC considers that a contractual term providing for an early exit fee which is unconscionable under the Code is likely to also be unfair under the ASIC Act. However, its opinion is that it does not necessarily follow that a fee that is not unconscionable will be fair for the purposes of the ASIC Act, as the relevant tests under the Code and ASIC Act are different.

Both provisions commence on 1 July 2010 and will be administered by ASIC.

The National Credit Code provisions in respect of unconscionable fees are unchanged from the Uniform Consumer Credit Code and will therefore apply to pre-1 July 2010 home mortgage contracts as well as new home loans and residential investment loans made on or after 1 July 2010.

The ASIC Act provisions will apply to contracts entered or renewed on or after 1 July 2010 as well as terms in contracts varied on or after 1 July 2010.

Once the laws commence, if a borrower thinks that an early exit fee they have been charged is unconscionable or unfair, they can:

  • complain to their lender and, if needed, take the dispute to the lender’s External Dispute Resolution Scheme;
  • complain to ASIC; and/or
  • challenge the fee in court proceedings.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Financial Services, Trade Practices

Australian Consumer Law stage 2 passed

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Bill (No 2) 2010 has been passed by Parliament.

The Bill represents stage 2 of amendments to the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TP Act) as part of a plan to create a single national consumer law for Australia, including a national product safety law. Part 1 will start on 1 July 2010.

The Bill changes the name of the TP Act to the “Competition and Consumer Act 2010″.

The Bill’s changes include:

  • incorporating the fair trading and consumer protection provisions of the TP Act into the ACL, including unfair contract terms and provisions implementing enhanced enforcement powers, penalties and redress options;
  • creating a national legislative scheme for consumer product safety, to replace the existing Commonwealth, State and Territory regulatory schemes;
  • creating a national legislative scheme for statutory consumer guarantees, to replace the existing Commonwealth and State and Territory legislation concerning implied conditions and warranties in consumer transactions; and
  • augmenting the fair trading and consumer protection provisions of the TP Act with changes drawn from existing provisions of the consumer laws of the States and Territories.

Government amendments in the Senate included:

  • returning the definition of a ‘consumer’ (which applies to provisions of the ACL dealing with consumer guarantees,
    unsolicited consumer agreements, lay-by sales, the provision of itemised bills, continuing credit contracts and linked credit
    contracts) to apply to any person that purchases goods and services below $40,000 in value;
  • as a consequence of the aforementioned amendment, allow suppliers and manufacturers to limit their liability in respect of goods not ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption that fail to meet the standards
    required by consumer guarantees (in line with existing sections 68A and 74L of the TP Act);
  • clarifying that a consumer may choose to terminate a contract for the supply of services that are connected to goods that have been rejected;
  • clarifying that the obligation upon a supplier to refund monies in respect of services when connected goods have been rejected extends only to services that have not yet been consumed;
  • clarifying that the scope of the definition of an ‘unsolicited consumer agreement’ includes situations where a consumer provides contact information to a supplier for purposes other than soliciting goods or services (such as entering a
    competition) or where a consumer contacts a supplier in response to a failed attempt by a supplier to contact them (missed call marketing); and
  • clarifying that a supplier is entitled to recover certain amounts from a consumer if an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated.

UPDATE: Bill assented to on 13 July 2010.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Consumer Law, Trade Practices

Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill update

The Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2010 was introduced into the Senate on 24 June 2010.

Parliament will next sit on 24 August.

Background: unfair terms in insurance contracts

UPDATE: This Bill has lapsed with the calling of the election for 21 August.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Insurance

APRA’s supervisory powers expanded

The Financial Sector Legislation Amendment (Prudential Refinements and Other Measures) Bill 2010 has been passed by both Houses of Parliament and is awaiting assent.

The Bill expand APRA’s supervisory powers.

UPDATE: The Bill received Royal Assent on 29 June 2010.

Financial Sector Legislation Amendment (Prudential Refinements and Other Measures) Act 2010 now available on ComLaw here.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Financial Services

June 27, 2010

Exposure draft of new Australian Privacy Principles released

The Government has released an exposure draft of the new Australian Privacy Principles which will be a key part of amendments to the Privacy Act. It has also published a companion guide.

The new principles have been referred to the Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee for consultation. The reporting date is 21 September 2010.

The new set of principles will replace the two existing sets of principles (one for government and for private organisations)governing dealings with personal information.

Further reforms to the Privacy Act will be released for public consultation in stages, including provisions relating to:

  • more comprehensive credit reporting to improve individual credit assessments, alongside privacy protections and responsible lending practices;
  • the protection of health information, in particular improving health sector information flows; and
  • strengthening the Privacy Commissioner powers to conduct investigations, resolve complaints and promote compliance with the Privacy Act and integrating the Privacy Commissioner into the newly-created Office of the Australian Information Commissioner.

Each stage will be referred to a Senate Committee for consideration as it is ready.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 27th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Privacy

ASIC releases updated requirements for unlisted debentures and unsecured notes

ASIC has released an updated version of Regulatory Guide 69 Debentures and unsecured notes–improving disclosure for retail investors (RG 69).

The updated version of RG 69 sets out:

  • adjustments to the eight benchmarks that issuers should disclose against on an ‘if not, why not?’ basis from 1 September 2010, including those relating to minimum amounts of equity capital; adequate liquidity; and disclosure about loan portfolios and valuations
  • the plain-English explanations that issuers should provide in prospectuses from 1 September 2010 about the importance of their benchmark disclosures
  • information on naming restrictions that will apply to debentures and unsecured notes under s283BH of the Corporations Act 2001 from 1 July 2011.

From 1 July 2011, ASIC will no longer permit some products to be called debentures. It will discontinue its interim no action position announced in 2005 in relation to non-compliance with the naming restrictions in s283BH limiting the types of financial products that can be called debentures. This will mean products not secured over tangible property (i.e. property with an actual physical existence) will need to be called unsecured notes or unsecured deposit notes.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 27th June 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act, Financial Services, Uncategorized