feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

July 30, 2010

ASIC guide on insolvent trading

ASIC has released Regulatory Guide 217 Duty to prevent insolvent trading: Guide for directors (RG 217) to assist directors to understand and comply with their duty under the Corporations Act 2001 to prevent insolvent trading.

Section 588G of the Corporations Act requires a director of a company to prevent the company from incurring a debt if the company is insolvent, or if the company will become insolvent by incurring the debt or a range of debts including the debt.

The four key principles which ASIC considers directors should follow to meet their obligation to prevent insolvent trading are:

  • keep themselves informed about the company’s financial position and affairs;
  • regularly assess the company’s solvency and investigate financial difficulties immediately;
  • obtain appropriate professional advice to help address the company’s financial difficulties where necessary; and
  • consider and act in a timely manner on the advice.

RG 217 also details factors and evidence which ASIC will consider when deciding to bring proceedings against a director for allowing a company to trade while insolvent (including criminal proceedings and proceedings to recover compensation for loss resulting from insolvent trading).

RG 217 contains an appendix setting out indicators of potential insolvency.

ASIC has made clear that RG 217 only sets out its intended policy on this issue and in no way affects any action that may be taken by creditors or a liquidator against directors who may have traded while insolvent.

Curiously the list of cases referred to in RG 217 does not include Hall v Poolman.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 30th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act

Trusted for transactions

You may know about Langes+ as advisers on regulatory compliance.

But that’s only part of what we do.

We are also experienced with major business transactions like mergers and acquisitions, commercial lending and outsourcing.

To find out more, have a look here.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 30th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Business Planning

July 26, 2010

Proposals for regulation of remittance providers

The Minister for Home Affairs Brendan O’Connor has released proposals to stop international funds transfer services being used to fund people smuggling and serious crime.

Under the improved registration scheme, the CEO of AUSTRAC would be given the power to refuse, suspend, cancel or impose conditions on registration of remittance providers.

In particular, if the CEO believed that a significant money laundering, terrorism financing or people smuggling risk existed, the CEO would refuse or cancel a person’s registration.

Under the changes the AUSTRAC CEO would consider criminal history, compliance history and ownership when deciding whether someone should be allowed to be a remitter.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 26th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering, Financial Services

ASIC report on disclosure by capital protected products

ASIC has released a report Review of disclosure for capital protected products and retail structured or derivative products (Report 201) outlining its key findings from a review of selected Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) for capital protected products and other structured or derivative products marketed to retail investors.

ASIC recommends issuers:

  • clearly explain counterparty risk, and include supporting financial information, to ensure retail investors can assess the issuer’s financial ability to meet its counterparty obligations of capital protected products,
  • ensure disclosure is sufficient so that investors can assess the likelihood of early termination or any other significant limitations of these products
  • provide better disclosure of break costs that may apply where an investor seeks to terminate or redeem a product before its maturity date.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 26th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act, Financial Services

New Privacy Commissioner appointed

Timothy Pilgrim has been appointed as Australia’s new Privacy Commissioner.

From 1 November the Privacy Commissioner will become part of the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 26th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Privacy

July 18, 2010

Election called: bills lapse

The 2010 federal election will be held on 21 August.

The Bills currently before Parliament will lapse.

These include the Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Bill 2010, the Corporations Amendment (No 1) Bill 2010 and the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2010.

The Bankruptcy Amendment Bill, Stage 2 of the Australian Consumer Law and Paid Parental Leave have all been passed and assented.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 18th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Business Planning

Who is a credit provider under the Privacy Act?

If your organisation is a credit provider for Privacy Act purposes you can gain access to credit reports provided you follow the procedures.

The definition of “credit provider” for credit reporting purposes is wider than the National Consumer Credit Protection definition which requires consumer credit providers to be licensed and follow strict requirements.

For Privacy Act credit reporting purposes, the Privacy Commissioner has determined that in addition to the credit providers listed in Section 11B(1)(a) and (b)(iii) to (iv) of the Privacy Act, “All corporations belonging to the following classes are to be regarded as credit providers for the purposes of the Privacy Act:

  • a corporation where, in relation to a transaction, it is considering providing or has provided a loan in respect of the provision of goods or services on terms which allow the deferral of payment, in full or in part, for at least 7 days; or
  • a corporation engaged in the hiring, leasing or renting of goods, where, in relation to a transaction, no amount, or an amount less than the value of the goods, is paid as deposit for return of the goods, and the relevant arrangement is one of at least 7 days duration. “

If you are not sure whether you are complying with the Privacy Act, do not understand its impact on your organisation or want advice on the proposed Privacy Act changes please call us.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 18th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Privacy

July 16, 2010

Award coverage threshold updated

The high income threshold in the Fair Work Act 2009 for modern award coverage increased to $113,800 from 1 July 2010.

Modern awards do not cover employees who are paid a guaranteed amount of $113,800 p.a. (during the year ended 30 June 2011 – indexed annually).

Employees who earn over the new high income threshold, and who are not covered by a modern award or enterprise agreement, are not entitled to the unfair dismissal protections in the Fair Work Act 2009.

The Fair Work Ombudsman has updated the Fair Work Information Statement to account for this change.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 16th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Workplace

July 15, 2010

ASIC’S monitoring of financial services providers

This article by David Jacobson was first published in Retail Banking Review.

Did you know that ASIC monitors online, print, TV and radio ads as well as seminars promoting financial products?

The information ASIC gathers is included in its research reports and if ASIC identifies a breach of the law or a potential breach it will pursue this with the promoter. ASIC has extensive investigatory powers if a company does not co-operate.

ASIC can either prosecute breaches or accept an enforceable undertaking from a company to comply with the law and, when relevant, to refund money to or compensate consumers. Occasionally a genuine dispute will come before the courts. ASIC’s powers are separate from a consumer’s rights.

Changes from 1 July 2010
On 1 July 2010 ASIC became both the national regulator for consumer credit (under the National Credit Code) as well as the supervisor for an expanded financial services consumer protection scheme (under the ASIC Act).

These roles are in addition to its existing duties as the financial services regulator for deposit-taking facilities and other financial products and securities markets.

ASIC’s role includes enforcing prohibitions on misleading representations, unconscionable conduct and misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to all financial services, including deposit and credit products.

Its duties involve monitoring how financial service providers market and disclose their product terms as well as ensuring that fees are calculated in accordance with contracts and are not unfair.

Examples of ASIC’s activities can be found in its report on term deposits and its proposals in respect of mortgage exit fees.
(more…)

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 15th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act, Financial Services

July 14, 2010

CAMAC Information Paper on Executive Remuneration

CAMAC has published an Information Paper on some of the approaches taken in Australia and internationally in respect of the regulation of executive remuneration arrangements, including the use and implications of various types of incentives and reporting on executive remuneration arrangements.

The Paper usefully summarises current legislation as well as the approaches taken by the Productivity Commission, APRA and the ASX Corporate Governance Council and different industry associations.

CAMAC is seeking submissions by Friday 13 August 2010.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 14th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act