feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

July 30, 2010

ASIC guide on insolvent trading

ASIC has released Regulatory Guide 217 Duty to prevent insolvent trading: Guide for directors (RG 217) to assist directors to understand and comply with their duty under the Corporations Act 2001 to prevent insolvent trading.

Section 588G of the Corporations Act requires a director of a company to prevent the company from incurring a debt if the company is insolvent, or if the company will become insolvent by incurring the debt or a range of debts including the debt.

The four key principles which ASIC considers directors should follow to meet their obligation to prevent insolvent trading are:

  • keep themselves informed about the company’s financial position and affairs;
  • regularly assess the company’s solvency and investigate financial difficulties immediately;
  • obtain appropriate professional advice to help address the company’s financial difficulties where necessary; and
  • consider and act in a timely manner on the advice.

RG 217 also details factors and evidence which ASIC will consider when deciding to bring proceedings against a director for allowing a company to trade while insolvent (including criminal proceedings and proceedings to recover compensation for loss resulting from insolvent trading).

RG 217 contains an appendix setting out indicators of potential insolvency.

ASIC has made clear that RG 217 only sets out its intended policy on this issue and in no way affects any action that may be taken by creditors or a liquidator against directors who may have traded while insolvent.

Curiously the list of cases referred to in RG 217 does not include Hall v Poolman.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 30th July 2010 by David Jacobson in Corporations Act