feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

November 8, 2011

Report on money laundering in Australia

AUSTRAC has published Money laundering in Australia 2011.

The report brings together law enforcement, intelligence and regulatory information to present a picture of current money laundering activity, vulnerabilities and emerging threats in Australia. It focusses on the different money laundering channels and the government’s response.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 8th November 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering

October 31, 2011

Electronic customer identity verification and privacy

The e-verification provisions in section 35A of the AML/CTF Act expressly permit the use and disclosure of credit reporting information for electronic identity verification purposes to satisfy obligations under the AML/CTF Act, instead of documents, provided the reporting entity has obtained express and informed consent from an individual prior to making a verification request.

A breach of these requirements is a breach of section 13A Privacy Act: section 35L AML/CTF Act.

In summary the e-verification provisions:
• permit a reporting entity to disclose specified personal information (including name, date of birth and residential address) to a credit reporting agency (CRA) for identity verification purposes with the express consent of the individual whose identity is being verified;
• permit a CRA to conduct a matching process between personal information provided to it by a reporting entity and the personal information held on its own files and provide an assessment to the reporting entity of the outcome of the verification process;
• require reporting entities to notify their customers, or other individuals required to be identified under the AML/CTF Act, of unsuccessful attempts to verify identity using credit reporting data;
• require credit reporting agencies and reporting entities to retain information about verification requests and assessments for 7 years from the date of the request for CRAs and for 7 years after ceasing to provide designated services to a customer for reporting entities and to delete it at the end of those periods;
• require a CRA to keep information about verification requests separate from the individual’s credit information file;
• create offences to address unauthorised access to, and disclosure of, verification information.

The use of personal information contained in a credit information file is limited to verification of identification information for customers, or other individuals the reporting entity is required to identify, who are natural persons.

Reporting entities are required to obtain express and informed consent from an individual prior to making a verification request: express consent can be indicated in writing (eg in an account application), online, or on the phone. However, records must be retained to evidence the process followed and the consent given by the individual.

In an online context a customer may be required to ‘check’ a box indicating that the customer has read the information and consents but a failure to opt out (by unchecking a ticked consent box) will not indicate consent.

To ensure that the consent is informed, the consent must be specifically about the disclosure of personal information by the reporting entity to the CRA and use by the CRA of the personal information contained in credit information files for an assessment. The consent must specify that the reporting entity will only use the assessment by the reporting entity for the purpose of verifying the individual’s identity for the purposes of the AML/CTF Act: a general consent to the use of information to verify identity will not be sufficient. If an individual other than the customer is being identified, that person will also have to consent to the process.

The individual must be given information about the reason for making the request for verification, the personal information that may be provided to the CRA, and the fact that the reporting entity is seeking, and the CRA may provide an assessment of whether the personal information matches (in whole or in part) information on the individual’s credit information file.

To ensure that the consent is genuine, paragraph 35A(2)(c) requires that the individual must be given another option, not reliant upon credit reporting information, for verifying their identity.

The reporting entity must retain a record containing specified information relating to a verification request. Section 35F of the AML/CTF Act requires a reporting entity to retain this information for a period starting from the date of the verification request and ending 7 years after the reporting entity ceased providing a designated service to the individual, and must delete it at the end of that period.

The record must contain the name of the CRA to which the request was made, the personal information provided to the CRA, the assessment received, and any other information specified in the AML/CTF Rules.

An individual has the right to:
• Choose whether to agree to verification using information held on their credit information file (section 35A of the AML/CTF Act).
• Be advised if a verification attempt is unsuccessful (section 35C of the AML/CTF Act), including details of which CRA was involved, and offered an alternative means of verification.
• Access information relating to verification requests from the reporting entity and from the CRA (section 35G of the AML/CTF Act).

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 31st October 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering, Privacy

October 19, 2011

AML/CTF Rule changes

AUSTRAC has released 2 sets of draft amendments to the AML/CTF rules:

Chapter 23
These draft amendments to Chapter 23 specify that persons who carry out a ‘law practice’ or an ‘accounting practice’ are ‘non-financiers’ as defined in section 5 of the AML/CTF Act and are not carrying out a designated remittance arrangement.

A public consultation period is open from Tuesday 18 October to Tuesday 15 November 2011.

Chapter 28
These amendments to Chapter 28 make it clear that the exemption from conducting the applicable customer identification procedures on assignment, conveyance, sale or transfer of businesses contained in Chapter 28 in certain circumstances, also applies to voluntary transfers of business undertaken pursuant to the Financial Sector (Business Transfer and Group Restructure) Act 1999.

A public consultation period is open from Tuesday 18 October to Tuesday 15 November 2011.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 19th October 2011 by admin in Anti-money laundering

October 12, 2011

AUSTRAC strategies and priorities 2011-12

AUSTRAC has published its Supervision, Intelligence and Enforcement strategy documents for 2011-12.

They focus on AUSTRAC’s roles as AML/CTF regulator and Australia’s financial intelligence unit.

Amongst other things ” In 2011–12, AUSTRAC plans to triple its supervisory efforts compared to 2010–11, by undertaking 7,000 supervision engagements with reporting entities. In keeping with past practice, AUSTRAC’s intensive supervision activity will include both assessment-based work and awareness building activities.

Assessments will be conducted on those reporting entities which demonstrate anomalous compliance behaviours. It is expected that this intensive assessment activity will apply to at least 1,000 reporting entities.”

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 12th October 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering

October 6, 2011

AML/CTF remittance dealer provisions

The Combating the Financing of People Smuggling and Other Measures Act 2011 – Proclamation fixes 1 November 2011 as the day on which the remittance dealer provisions in items 1 to 11 of Schedule 1 of the Combating the Financing of People Smuggling and Other Measures Act 2011 commences.

The primary purpose of the provisions is to reduce the risk of money transfers by remittance dealers being used to fund people smuggling ventures and other serious crimes by introducing a more comprehensive anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulatory regime for the remittance sector.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 6th October 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering, Financial Services

September 28, 2011

Enrolment of AML/CTF reporting entities

AUSTRAC has announced details of the new enrolment requirements.

From 1 November 2011, all AML/CTF reporting entities need to enrol with AUSTRAC, including those that have enrolled with AUSTRAC before.

All existing reporting entities (including those that have an exemption from Part 7) must enrol by 28 November 2011.

New reporting entities must enrol within 28 days of providing or commencing to provide a designated service.

Reporting entities will also need to keep their enrolment information up-to-date and advise the AUSTRAC CEO of a change in the enrolment details within 14 days of the change.

Enrolment information will assist AUSTRAC in identifying which entities will be subject to the annual supervisory cost recovery levy that will apply from the 2011-12 financial year, and the amount of the levy which will apply to each leviable entity.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th September 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering

September 16, 2011

Austrac Typologies and case studies report 2011

AUSTRAC’s 2011 typologies report includes case studies illustrating how legitimate services offered by Australian businesses have been exploited for criminal purposes. By highlighting these past examples of criminal activity, the report is intended to educate Australian businesses about their money laundering and terrorism financing risks and helps them recognise and mitigate these risks.

The first section of the report examines the particular methods used to commit serious transnational crimes: fraud, terrorism financing, and people smuggling and human trafficking.

The case studies cover account and deposit-taking services, gambling services and remittance services (money transfer).

The report also contains indicators of potential ML/TF activity.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 16th September 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering, Financial Services

August 18, 2011

Threshold transaction identification requirements

From 1 October 2011 reporting entities will be required to include details of the individual conducting the threshold transaction where that individual is not the customer of the designated service. (Background)

Austrac has issued a Guidance Note for reporting entities as well as a Fact Sheet for the public

Reporting entities will be expected to use new October 2011 TTR forms for all threshold transactions that take place from 1 October 2011 onwards (information about the form changeover).

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 18th August 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering

July 8, 2011

Updated AML/CTF Act

ComLaw has published a consolidated Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 taking into account amendments up to Combating the Financing of People Smuggling and Other Measures Act 2011 that applied as at 1 July 2011 but not the Costs Recovery Acts.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 8th July 2011 by Patrick Dwyer in Anti-money laundering

June 23, 2011

Banking Sanctions Against Syria and Libya

The Reserve Bank of Australia has been directed by the Australian Government to take steps under the Banking (Foreign Exchange) Regulations 1959 to implement new autonomous targeted financial sanctions against Syria and further autonomous targeted financial sanctions against Libya.

Specific transactions involving the dealing of funds by the order of, on behalf of, or for the benefit of, any person or entity listed in the Reserve Bank’s Media Release Syria Annex or the updated Libya Annex are prohibited.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 23rd June 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering
« Newer PostsOlder Posts »