feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

December 22, 2011

Season’s greetings and subscription information

Thank you for reading our news throughout 2011.

We wish you a safe and happy holiday break.

During the quiet period our news will be less frequent but we will be working and monitoring regulatory changes and planning for 2012.

In case you’ve forgotten or missed it, there are a variety of options to get Langes news (without checking our website):

You can subscribe via Twitter by following @langeslaw

Another approach is via email. If you use the email option, be sure to click the confirmation link you get in the email, and allow it through your spam filter.

Some people prefer to follow the feed on facebook.

My favorite way to read newsfeeds is with an RSS reader. You can choose to get only one of our new services or a feed that combines them all.

Subscribe here.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 22nd December 2011 by David Jacobson in Business Planning, Compliance

December 9, 2011

Langes Responsible Manager Seminars: February 2012

Langes are pleased to announce our Responsible Manager seminars in February 2012.

These seminars for AFS and ACL licencees cover current hot topics and a general update on things you must get right. The seminars delve in depth into all the ‘must-know’ rules and traps for each topic.

Topics are selected for their relevance for Responsible Managers. All
topics contain practical case studies and examples.

It is a practical guide to the most recent changes and topical issues affecting financial services and credit licensees, including latest cases, legislation, regulatory developments and other tips on how to prove compliance.

Key Information

* Cost: $330 (incl GST) per person
* CPD points: 3 points
* Time: 9am – 12:30 noon (registration 8:30am)
* Location: Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne Adelaide
* Designed for: Responsible Managers who wish to stay up to date with all the relevant finance industry regulatory news

When and where
Brisbane: Tuesday 7 February 2012
Sydney: Wednesday 8 February 2012
Melbourne: Tuesday 14 February 2012
Adelaide: Wednesday 15 February 2012

Register your interest
Brisbane
Sydney
Melbourne
Adelaide

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 9th December 2011 by admin in Compliance, Financial Services

December 7, 2011

Standards for compliance officers: fit and proper

A recent UK Financial Services Authority decision gives some insights as to its expectation as a regulator of the role of a compliance officer. Although ASIC has not taken similar action in Australia, it does have banning powers.

The FSA fined a hedge fund manager compliance officer 14,000 pounds and banned her from performing any significant influence function in regulated financial services for failing to carry out her duties with due skill and care. She was declared not a fit and proper person.

Dr Sandradee Joseph held the Compliance Oversight controlled function and the Money Laundering Reporting controlled function at Dynamic Decisions Capital Management Limited.

When concerns about bond transactions were brought to her attention by investors she failed to read or give adequate consideration to the matters raised. In fact the transactions had been carried out by another employee to conceal losses suffered by the fund following the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

When interviewed by the FSA Dr Joseph stated that she considered her role as a reporting function, in addition to which, she would be responsible for setting up systems. She said she had no responsibility for the Fund as a lawyer because that was dealt with by external law firms and therefore she could “take a back seat” and that she was satisfied that there were sufficient advisors looking at the documentation relating to the Bond. She also said she did not understand the Bond, so she did not consider that reviewing the documents would have made much sense to her.

She relied on false information from the fraudulent employee in respect of the transaction. In fact no lawyers had been instructed.

The FSA concluded she should have taken steps to ensure that the investors’ concerns were investigated, to verify if the concerns appeared to be legitimate, and if so to take appropriate action.

FSA Final Notice

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 7th December 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering, Compliance, Financial Services

December 6, 2011

Updated 2012 compliance calendar

With the passage of important legislation in November, it is worth updating the list of new obligations starting in 2012 (subject to change!):

1 January 2012

  • standard ACL wording in warranties against defects
  • new home loan key facts sheet starts
  • new national work health and safety laws
  • new unconscionable conduct rules start (estimated)
  • Super funds and RSA providers can use TFN’s to identify and consolidate accounts

30 January 2012

  • PPS Register starts

1 February 2012

  • new deposit guarantee limit starts

1 April 2012

  • deadline for credit licensees to commence use of Australian Credit Licence numbers

1 July 2012

  • consolidated APRA prudential standards take effect
  • new national system for business names registration
  • Financial advice reforms due to start
  • new credit card disclosure provisions start
  • new reverse mortgage rules start
  • New account switching rules
  • new hardship loan variation rules
  • new consumer leases rules
  • new small amount credit contract rules
  • new national Not For Profits Regulation starts
  • new price signalling laws for banking sector (estimated)
  • carbon pricing scheme commences

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 6th December 2011 by admin in Business Planning, Compliance

November 18, 2011

Are facilitation payments bribes?

The Minister for Home Affairs has released a public consultation paper on possible changes to Australia’s anti‑foreign bribery laws.

The Criminal Code (Cth) provides an offence for bribing foreign public officials.

The facilitation payment defence provides a defence to the offence of foreign bribery if:

  • the value of the benefit was of a minor nature; and
  • the person’s conduct was engaged in for the sole or dominant purpose of expediting or securing the performance of a routine government action of a minor nature; and
  • as soon as practicable after the conduct occurred, the person made a record of the conduct.

The Government is reviewing:

•the treatment of ‘facilitation payments’ under Australian law
•the factors that influence whether a benefit is ‘legitimately due’ to the recipient
•the current requirement to identify a particular foreign public official in order to establish an offence, and
•the role of dishonesty in domestic corruption offences.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 18th November 2011 by David Jacobson in Anti-money laundering, Business Planning, Compliance

September 19, 2011

A reporting calendar is not a compliance plan

It is important that you maintain a calendar of lodging dates for legal and regulatory requirements. But such a calendar is not a compliance plan. It is one of the outcomes of a compliance plan.

A reporting calendar will include reports relating to employees, company secretarial matters, financial statements, prudential returns and taxation.

In the financial services industry a calendar will include the ASIC credit licence compliance certificate, ASIC FS 71, APRA reports and Austrac reports.

Here is a list of the regulatory reforms proposed for the next year that we are watching and that you need to plan for:

1 October 2011
Credit disclosure documents requirements commence

1 January 2012

  • new national work health and safety laws
  • standard Australian Consumer Law wording in warranties against defects commences
  • new home loan key facts sheet starts

1 February 2012

  • PPS Register starts
  • new deposit guarantee limit starts

1 April 2012
deadline for use of Australian Credit Licence numbers in documents

1 July 2012

  • new national system for business names registration
  • Financial advice reforms due to start
  • new credit card provisions start
  • new reverse mortgage rules start
  • new ePayments Code replaces EFT Code
  • New account switching rules
  • new hardship variation rules
  • new consumer leases rules.
  • Print This Post Print This Post

    Posted 19th September 2011 by David Jacobson in Business Planning, Compliance, Financial Services

    September 13, 2011

    Don’t confuse job titles with reporting lines: compliance planning

    I recently spoke with a CFO whose roles included management accounting and internal auditing as well as compliance and risk.

    I asked him who he reported to and he rattled off 3 different reporting lines depending on the role he was performing, including reporting to a Board Risk Committee with copies to the CEO for important compliance or audit functions as opposed to reporting to the CEO for usual business reporting.

    Developing a compliance plan helps clarify reporting lines and the role of the person whose function includes that of compliance officer.

    Not every business can afford a dedicated compliance officer: that person’s role may overlap with the role of internal auditor (and sometimes company secretary or general counsel).

    A compliance plan should set out who does what, when and how.

    Compliance officers generally review compliance with external regulatory requirements (eg laws, regulations, codes, standards) rather than internal business policies and controls.

    The compliance officer may also have a training and development and business process improvement function.

    A compliance plan also needs to identify who is responsible for:
    • developing and administering monitoring and surveillance systems to detect potential breaches of legal and regulatory requirements;
    • investigating, rectifying and reporting on breaches of legal and regulatory requirements (including customer complaints);
    • filing various notices and returns with regulators; and
    • liaising with regulators in relation to regulatory matters.

    Print This Post Print This Post

    Posted 13th September 2011 by David Jacobson in Compliance

    July 10, 2011

    Case note: ACCC v Optus $5.26 million misleading ads penalty

    In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761 Optus was ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $5.26 million for misleading advertisements (Optus 1 was previously discussed here).

    The penalty followed previous orders for injunctions and corrective advertising in Optus 2 and Optus 3.

    Judge Perram considered the mandatory and non-mandatory factors relevant to determining a penalty, including the deliberateness of the conduct including its failure to adequately review its compliance program as previously underaken. Although there was no deliberate fraud, it is clear that Optus’ compliance program was ineffective. Judge Perram examined the process in detail (see below).

    It is instructive to understand how the penalty was calculated as well as the implications of Optus failing to implement an effective advertisement vetting process.
    (more…)

    Print This Post Print This Post

    Posted 10th July 2011 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Consumer Law, Marketing, Trade Practices

    April 13, 2011

    Website legal compliance

    Websites (whether a company’s own website or its Facebook or Twitter sites) are amongst the first place regulators look at when conducting surveillance of an industry or a particular business.

    Website surveys will focus on whether marketing activities are lawful or whether required disclosure is adequate.

    In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 74 Justice Finkelstein of the Federal Court fined Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (formerly known as Advanced Allergy Elimination) and its director, Mr Paul Keir, $7,500 each for contempt of undertakings made to the court following a successful 2009 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission action for false, misleading and deceptive conduct.

    Justice Finkelstein decided that Allergy Pathway and Mr Keir made prohibited representations about Allergy Pathway’s purported allergy treatment on its website and on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube in breach of those undertakings.

    The representations included testimonials written and posted by clients on Allergy Pathway’s Facebook “wall” and testimonials written by clients and posted by Allergy Pathway on its website and Facebook and Twitter pages.

    In his judgment Justice Finkelstein said: “while it cannot be said that Allergy Pathway was responsible for the initial publication of testimonials (the original publisher was the third party who posted the testimonials on Allergy Pathway’s Twitter and Facebook pages) it is appropriate to conclude that Allergy Pathway accepted responsibility for the publications when it knew of them and decided not to remove them. Hence it became the publisher of the testimonials.”

    In addition to the fines, the court ordered that Allergy Pathway and Mr Keir be restrained from engaging in similar conduct for a further period of three years and to publish corrective advertising. Allergy Pathway and Mr Keir were also ordered to pay the ACCC’s legal costs on an indemnity basis.

    The corrective advertising notice was ordered to meet specific criteria:

    • it must be viewable by clicking a ‘click-through’ icon located on the websites and Facebook and Twitter pages;
    • the ‘click-through’ icon must be located at the top of the homepage of the websites and Facebook and Twitter pages;
    • the ‘click-through’ icon must contain the words “False and Misleading Conduct and Contempt of Court by Allergy Pathway – Corrective Notice Ordered by Federal Court of Australia” prominently in red text on a black background and the words “click here”; and
    • the notice must occupy the entire page that is accessed via the “click-through” icon referred to above.

    Print This Post Print This Post

    Posted 13th April 2011 by admin in Compliance, Consumer Law, Financial Services, Marketing, Trade Practices, Web/Tech

    February 7, 2011

    Financial service regulation and compliance issues for 2011

    This article was first published in Retail Banking Review

    GFC or not, the volume of new legislation, and its complexity, increases every year. As evidence, look at the calendar of compliance changes scheduled this year at the end of this article. These need to be factored into the year’s compliance calendar.

    But compliance cannot be run by a calendar alone. Unplanned events (such as a computer system breakdown, a regulatory investigation or a natural disaster) show the need for compliance to be integrated with risk management. Compliance requires ongoing planning at a high level rather than being given a low priority and adopting a tick the box approach.

    Regulators view business planning as an essential corporate governance obligation.
    (more…)

    Print This Post Print This Post

    Posted 7th February 2011 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Financial Services