feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

August 7, 2007

Same-Sex Entitlements

The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission’s Same-Sex: Same Entitlements Report has identified 58 laws that must be amended to eliminate discrimination against same-sex
couples and their children in the area of federal financial and
work-related entitlements.

The Report concludes that straightforward definition changes could remove discrimination in the following areas:

  • Employment
  • Workers’ Compensation
  • Tax
  • Social Security
  • Veterans’ Entitlements
  • Health Care Costs
  • Family Law
  • Superannuation
  • Aged Care
  • Migration.

UPDATE: Draft Bill introduced into Senate on 14 August 2007 as a Private Senator’s Bill.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 7th August 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance

August 4, 2007

Federal Parliament resumes

Parliament is resuming for its Spring Sittings starting with the period 7 to 16 August 2007.

Debate will resume on Government bills already introduced with some new Bills marked for introduction and passage this sittings (subject to an election announcement).

On Tuesday the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services is scheduled to deliver its Report of inquiry into the structure and operation of the superannuation industry .

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 4th August 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance

July 31, 2007

ATO offers Div 7A amnesty

The ATO has issued practice statement PSLA 2007/20 setting out how taxpayers can take corrective action to fix mistakes made between 2001-02 and 2006-07 regarding payments and loans from their
private companies and avoid penalties under Division 7A. The Commissioner has a discretion to enable him to provide relief for
deemed dividends that have arisen under Division 7A because of an
honest mistake or inadvertent omission.

The Practice Statement gives examples of omissions and corrective action where the exercise of the Commissioner’s discretion is not required.

If a taxpayer takes corrective action by 30 June 2008 they will not have to pay interest and penalties. However, even if they don’t have
to pay a penalty or interest, taxpayers will have to pay the correct
amount of tax provided the time limits under the law allow it.

From 1 July 2008, the Tax Office will resume audit work to ensure
payments made by private companies are correctly accounted for and
company loans are not used to distribute tax free profits.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 31st July 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance

July 23, 2007

Australian Government issues Foreign Bribery Information and Awareness Pack

The Minister for Justice and Customs has issued a Foreign Bribery Information and Awareness Pack to assist Australians who encounter foreign public officials, whether it is in the course of business or simply as a result of travelling overseas.

The pack contains information about the criminal offence, how to report suspected foreign bribery, taxation implications of foreign briber and identification of suspicious transactions and notification requirements.

The ATO has also issued Bribes and facilitation payments: A guide to managing your tax obligations.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 23rd July 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance

July 22, 2007

Tax Commissioner identifies business tax risks

In a recent Speech by Michael D’Ascenzo, Commissioner of Taxation, he identified tax risks for businesses and discussed:

  • the new ATO Guide Bribes and facilitation payments: A guide to managing your tax obligations;
  • The role of directors and board members in tax governance (including their own personal tax responsibilities);
  • rights and options received under share schemes for both executives and general employees;
  • ATO’s compliance program for large business;
  • an initiative encouraging people to come forward and make disclosures of undisclosed income from offshore activities.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 22nd July 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance

July 17, 2007

Are your online documents readily accessible?

With the commencement of the Simpler Regulatory System company reporting changes, many companies can be expected to save printing and mailing costs by making annual reports available online.

A typical condition imposed by laws when permitting documents to be given to your shareholders or customers by making them available online for reading or downloading (rather than requiring the mailing of a hard (printed) copy or the emailing or faxing of an electronic copy) is that they be "readily accessible". (See section 314(1AA)(b) Corporations Act).

"Readily accessible" means more than being available for reading or download by anyone who has internet access. The expression has its source in Section 9(1)(a) of the Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) where it is part of the phrase "readily accessible so as to
be useable for subsequent reference".

The readily accessible requirement appears to have been included to allow for changes in technology which can mean that over time different standards of communication can be become incompatible with later systems. Provided that the system used to transfer the information is relatively standard at the time of publication and is not difficult to use, then it should satisfy this test. For example, the PDF file format is now standard and the Adobe Acrobat Reader required to read it is freely available (and free). Use of a file format that was difficult to open would mean that the document is not "readily accessible".

As the legality of the giving of the document should not be questioned through lack of access, the direct address on the web site where the documents may be accessed should remain static for as long as they are relevant.

But accessibility may also be argued in the future to include whether:
•    the writing in the document is legible when viewed;
•    the document incorporates any image, message, advertisement or other feature that distracts the reader or reduces the reader’s ability to understand the document;
•    if an image, message, advertisement or other feature accompanies or is associated with the document, the reader is readily able to distinguish the image, message, advertisement or other feature from the document;
•    the reader can readily scroll through the whole of the document.

As more businesses make documents available on their website, consideration should be given as to whether they are readily accessible by looking at the following factors:

  • the ability of readers to find the document (is there a direct link, adequate navigation, reference on a site map or index?)
  • the file format of the document (HTML, PDF, Word, RTF or all?)
  • the ability of onscreen readers to increase the font size
  • for longer documents, the availablity of a summary or a tool such as a drop down list to find relevant parts of the document.

For example, the Alinta Scheme Booklet  as presented online seems to offer readers a range of features which may make it easier to read a complex legal document on their computer screen if they do not want to print or save it.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 17th July 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance

July 5, 2007

Tax agent regulation

The Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer, the Hon Peter
Dutton MP has released the draft Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Agent
Services) Bill 2007 and associated draft Regulations and draft
explanatory materials
for public exposure.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 5th July 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance

June 28, 2007

ASIC v Citigroup decision: no conflict and no insider trading

In Australian Securities and Investments
Commission v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited
(ACN 113 114 832)
(No. 4)
[2007] FCA 963, the Federal Court has dismissed ASIC’s claims and decided that :

(a)     Citigroup
did not contravene its obligations under s 912A(1)(aa) of the Corporations Act
to have in place adequate arrangements for the management of conflicts of
interest (as it did not have a conflict); and

(b)     Citigroup did not breach the provisions of
s 1043H of the Corporations Act and s 12DA of the ASIC Act which
prohibit misleading and deceptive conduct; and

(c)     Citigroup
did not contravene the
insider trading provisions contained in s 1043A of the Corporations Act (firstly because the trader was not an
"officer" of Citigroup and because he did not make the supposition alleged by
ASIC as a result of a discussion with his superior (that Citigroup was acting for Toll in
relation to the proposed takeover of Patrick) and secondly because the Chinese walls defence
contained in s 1043F of the Corporations Act was engaged.)

As discussed here, the proceedings arose out of the purchase by a public side employee of
Citigroup of over 1 million shares in Patrick Corporation Limited
(‘Patrick’) at a time when private side employees working in the
Investment Banking Division were acting for Citigroup’s client, Toll
Holdings Ltd (‘Toll’) on a proposed takeover bid for Patrick.  The
shares were purchased by the proprietary trader for Citigroup’s own
account on the last trading day before Toll announced its bid for Patrick. When private side employees
became aware of the proprietary trader’s purchase of the shares, steps
were taken from within the private side that resulted in an instruction to the
trader to stop buying any more shares in Patrick.  The trader did not buy more
shares but in the half hour before the close of trading, he sold nearly 200,000
of the parcel of Patrick shares that he had purchased earlier that day.

The Court accepted Citigroup’s  argument that  the terms of its letter of engagement with Toll excluded the existence of any
fiduciary relationship between the investment bank and its client. ASIC contended that, notwithstanding the existence of a clause in
the letter which excluded the existence of such a relationship, the investment
bank breached certain fiduciary duties to its client by failing to obtain the
client’s informed consent to proprietary trading in the takeover
target’s shares by another division of the bank.The Court decided that the law does not prevent an investment bank from contracting out of, or
modifying, any fiduciary obligations. In the absence of proof of a fiduciary relationship, ASIC’s main claims failed.

The judgment contains useful discussions about conflicts of interest, insider trading and Chinese walls.

UPDATE 29 June: ASIC comments: "The Court has clarified important aspects of insider
trading law, for example the operation of ‘Chinese Walls’ and the
passing of sensitive information.
These clarifications will assist ASIC in pursuing insider trading actions." 

UPDATE 18 July 2007: ASIC will not appeal

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 28th June 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Financial Services

June 22, 2007

Simpler Regulatory System: takeover rules changes

The Corporations Legislation Amendment (Simpler Regulatory System) Bill 2007 when passed will make amendments to the takeovers provisions in the Corporations Act.

Removal of telephone monitoring during takeover bids
The provisions of the Corporations Act that require the
recording, storing, destroying, accessing
and copying of the recordings of telephone conversations with retail
shareholders during takeover bids are repealed.

The purpose of the subdivision was
to ensure that security holders did not receive information from the
takeover bidder or target that could be considered misleading.

The existing provisions have not increased
the protection of security holders and impose significant costs on the
parties involved.

The repeal of the telephone monitoring
requirements will take effect on the day of Royal
Assent.

85 per cent notices
The provisions of the Corporations Act that require the disclosure of an 85 per cent holding are repealed.

The provisions were enacted to provide
holders of securities with an advanced warning that the majority holder
is approaching the 90 per cent limit, at which the majority holder can
compulsorily acquire their securities.

However, it is often the case that
the minority are already aware of the majority holder’s position. 
For listed entities, other mechanisms in the Corporations Act will mean
that the information is already publicly disclosed.

The repeal of the 85 per cent notice requirement will take effect on the day of Royal
Assent.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 22nd June 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance

June 18, 2007

The Simpler Regulatory System Package update

The Simpler Regulatory System Package was passed by the House of Representatives and introduced into the Senate on 14 June 2007.

The Government intends to pass the Bills this week so that certain provisions can commence on 1 July 2007.

As the Bills cover a range of topics (Financial Services Regulation, Company Reporting Obligations,  Auditor Independence,  Corporate Governance,  Fundraising,  Takeovers, and  Compliance) which I summarised here, I will do separate notes dealing with the final changes in each area.

UPDATE: Detailed notes now added on

Company reporting changes

Corporate governance

Fundraising

Takeover rules

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 18th June 2007 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Corporate Governance, Financial Services
« Newer PostsOlder Posts »