feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

July 10, 2011

Case note: ACCC v Optus $5.26 million misleading ads penalty

In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761 Optus was ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $5.26 million for misleading advertisements (Optus 1 was previously discussed here).

The penalty followed previous orders for injunctions and corrective advertising in Optus 2 and Optus 3.

Judge Perram considered the mandatory and non-mandatory factors relevant to determining a penalty, including the deliberateness of the conduct including its failure to adequately review its compliance program as previously underaken. Although there was no deliberate fraud, it is clear that Optus’ compliance program was ineffective. Judge Perram examined the process in detail (see below).

It is instructive to understand how the penalty was calculated as well as the implications of Optus failing to implement an effective advertisement vetting process.
(more…)

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 10th July 2011 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Consumer Law, Marketing, Trade Practices

April 13, 2011

Website legal compliance

Websites (whether a company’s own website or its Facebook or Twitter sites) are amongst the first place regulators look at when conducting surveillance of an industry or a particular business.

Website surveys will focus on whether marketing activities are lawful or whether required disclosure is adequate.

In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 74 Justice Finkelstein of the Federal Court fined Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (formerly known as Advanced Allergy Elimination) and its director, Mr Paul Keir, $7,500 each for contempt of undertakings made to the court following a successful 2009 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission action for false, misleading and deceptive conduct.

Justice Finkelstein decided that Allergy Pathway and Mr Keir made prohibited representations about Allergy Pathway’s purported allergy treatment on its website and on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube in breach of those undertakings.

The representations included testimonials written and posted by clients on Allergy Pathway’s Facebook “wall” and testimonials written by clients and posted by Allergy Pathway on its website and Facebook and Twitter pages.

In his judgment Justice Finkelstein said: “while it cannot be said that Allergy Pathway was responsible for the initial publication of testimonials (the original publisher was the third party who posted the testimonials on Allergy Pathway’s Twitter and Facebook pages) it is appropriate to conclude that Allergy Pathway accepted responsibility for the publications when it knew of them and decided not to remove them. Hence it became the publisher of the testimonials.”

In addition to the fines, the court ordered that Allergy Pathway and Mr Keir be restrained from engaging in similar conduct for a further period of three years and to publish corrective advertising. Allergy Pathway and Mr Keir were also ordered to pay the ACCC’s legal costs on an indemnity basis.

The corrective advertising notice was ordered to meet specific criteria:

  • it must be viewable by clicking a ‘click-through’ icon located on the websites and Facebook and Twitter pages;
  • the ‘click-through’ icon must be located at the top of the homepage of the websites and Facebook and Twitter pages;
  • the ‘click-through’ icon must contain the words “False and Misleading Conduct and Contempt of Court by Allergy Pathway – Corrective Notice Ordered by Federal Court of Australia” prominently in red text on a black background and the words “click here”; and
  • the notice must occupy the entire page that is accessed via the “click-through” icon referred to above.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 13th April 2011 by admin in Compliance, Consumer Law, Financial Services, Marketing, Trade Practices, Web/Tech

February 7, 2011

Financial service regulation and compliance issues for 2011

This article was first published in Retail Banking Review

GFC or not, the volume of new legislation, and its complexity, increases every year. As evidence, look at the calendar of compliance changes scheduled this year at the end of this article. These need to be factored into the year’s compliance calendar.

But compliance cannot be run by a calendar alone. Unplanned events (such as a computer system breakdown, a regulatory investigation or a natural disaster) show the need for compliance to be integrated with risk management. Compliance requires ongoing planning at a high level rather than being given a low priority and adopting a tick the box approach.

Regulators view business planning as an essential corporate governance obligation.
(more…)

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 7th February 2011 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Financial Services

January 17, 2011

Free Australian legal sources on the internet

At some stage, whether or not you are a lawyer, you will want to look at the primary source of a law or a court decision.

From time to time this site links to ComLaw and Austlii: ComLaw is the Australian Government site for legislation and regulations, Austlii is a free facility provided by the UTS and UNSW Faculties of Law and links to cases as well.

ComLaw has just been upgraded to ComLaw2, receiving a much needed redesign.

Austlii was a trailblazer internationally in making laws accessible on the internet for free. It helpfully publishes each section of a law on a separate page.

It also has some useful research tools.

If you want more advanced research tools Jade BarNet is also a free service providing online annotation and case library management, customised Alert email service for recent reports and other tools.

Have a look at each of them to see which you prefer.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 17th January 2011 by David Jacobson in Compliance, Web/Tech

January 4, 2011

Compliance review issues

I have been asked to give examples of the sort of problems we find on compliance reviews. Without breaching confidentiality, it may help if I explain why we do reviews and what we look for.

Why do a review?

The reasons we do reviews include:

  • to update processes for law changes;
  • as part of a merger or acquisition (to ensure that the key assets will be acquired without the prospect of future legal action);
  • as part of an ongoing compliance program (eg to test compliance annually);
  • because the Board or senior management want assurances before making declarations of compliance;
  • because a problem has been identified either internally, through a customer dispute or by a regulator.

When a problem has already been identified we may be asked to confirm the extent of the particular problem and whether other problems exist. This is important when a penalty hearing is likely and the background and extent of a breach is a relevant factor in determining the penalty. (See the United Credit Union decision).

We look for compliance in the areas of highest risk and ways clients can improve processes. We frequently recommend best practices to clients.

Problems can be one off, eg through a manual error or a software glitch, or systemic (eg a disclosure error that has affected all documents for a particular product).

We start off with a checklist for the particular issue we are reviewing. It is based on the statutory requirements and identifies the client’s documents, materials, computer systems and procedures we need to look at.

A theme may develop as we conduct our review.

We interview key staff.

Often there will be issues staff want to discuss.

Sometimes there will be issues related to an out of date procedure or a change to a compliant procedure which was not authorised. Or a document was copied from elsewhere without understanding its assumptions.

If an issue is identified as part of an ongoing review, it is evidence that your compliance framework works. The problem can then be remedied by you rather than wait for a customer complaint or regulator investigation.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 4th January 2011 by David Jacobson in Compliance

December 29, 2010

Compliance Training and Procedure Reviews

Significant legal and compliance changes over the last 12 months mean that it’s critical to ensure that your procedures have been updated and your staff has been adequately trained.

If you have an Australian Financial Services Licence or an Australian Credit Licence minimum annual training for staff is a mandatory licence condfition.

Langes+ offers practical training focussing on essential compliance issues.

We can either attend your offices anywhere in Australia or set up a program at an off-site facility.

Areas of law include:

  • Banking, consumer credit and financial services law
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Corporate governance and directors’ duties
  • Advertising law
  • Website and online financial services compliance
  • Anti-Money Laundering Law
  • Privacy law
  • Consumer protection (formerly trade practices) law
  • Workplace relations law

Examples of our training programs include:

  • Education packages for new board members, management or front-line staff
  • Risk management
  • Responsible officer training
  • Effective AGM’s and Board Meetings
  • Designing a product development system
  • Policy Development
  • Compliance officer training
  • Designing compliance systems
  • Auditing compliance systems
  • Corporate Governance Update
  • Financial Services Regulatory update (Privacy, Credit Code, FSR)
  • Consumer Protection Compliance training
  • Ecommerce regulation and IT governance

Call your local Langes office to discuss your requirements.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 29th December 2010 by David Jacobson in Compliance

May 20, 2010

Langes+ to open Melbourne office

We are excited to announce that Langes+ will be opening an office in Melbourne on 1 June 2010 with a new member of our team, Ronen Atzmon.

Ronen will be in charge of our Melbourne office. He is the former General Counsel of Cuscal, and will join Langes+ in the position of Executive Counsel. He has extensive experience in corporate and finance law and the mutuals sector.

Langes+ was formed with the vision of becoming a national law firm for the financial services sector. The Melbourne office is an important step in our growth strategy and will complement our existing representation in Sydney, Adelaide and Brisbane.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 20th May 2010 by David Jacobson in Compliance

May 13, 2010

National business names registration

A new national business names registration system is due to start in the first half of 2011. The proposed changeover date is 4 April 2011.

The purpose of business name registration is to protect consumers by identifying persons trading under names that aren’t the same as their personal, company or other entity name.

The scheme will also reduce administration for businesses trading in multiple jurisdictions.

Currently business names must be registered in each state or territory a business operates in. The new system requires business name registration nationally only, regardless of whether a business is not carried on in every state.

The National Register will
• Replace all the current state based registers
• Be administered and maintained by ASIC
• Be online
• Carry out automatic checks for identical or similar company or business names which are already registered

The ABN/Business Names Registration Project’s objectives include:

  • making business registration available online 24/7;
  • improving awareness about the different rights conferred by business names in comparison to trade marks;
  • enabling registration in one process for both an ABN and national business name.

New Registrations will require an ABN in order to register a new
business name.

Existing registrations will not require an ABN if the business name is
currently registered on a state register and does not have an ABN.

All current registrations will transfer across to the new national register.

If the same business name is registered in multiple jurisdictions by the same entity, all registrations will be merged into the one registration.
If the same business name is registered in multiple jurisdictions by different entities, registrations will be distinguished by state identifiers at the end of the name eg (SA), (NSW).

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 13th May 2010 by David Jacobson in Business names, Business Planning, Compliance, Intellectual Property

May 10, 2010

Proposed Bills for introduction

The Bills proposed for introduction and passage in the Winter sittings of the Commonwealth Parliament include:

Corporations Amendment (Corporate Reporting Reform) Bill
- cut red tape for unlisted public companies limited by guarantee, streamline parent entity reporting, provide greater flexibility for companies to pay dividends and to more easily change their year-end reporting dates
- improve disclosures in the directors’ report, refine the framework for solicitor representation letters, provide greater recognition of compliance with international financial reporting standards and refine the framework for lost capital reductions

Superannuation Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1)
- prevent product providers from marketing excessively risky products to superannuation funds

Financial Sector Legislation Amendment (Prudential Refinements and Other Measures) Bill -
enhance the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s (APRA’s) ability to regulate bodies in the financial sector in accordance with prudential laws

Paid Parental Leave Bill
Paid Parental Leave (Administration) Bill
Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill

- introduce Australia’s first comprehensive, statutory paid parental leave scheme, as announced by the Government in the 2009 Budget

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 10th May 2010 by David Jacobson in Compliance

May 9, 2010

Legislation update 2010-2013

This article by me was first published in Retail Banking Review here.

I’ve commented previously that media releases are not law. A law isn’t a law until it is passed by Parliament and for Commonwealth law, that means the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.

Not knowing if, when and in what form a law will be passed makes it hard to plan changes to documents, processes, pricing and software.

Much has been said lately about the Commonwealth Government’s “backflips” on its announced laws so it’s worthwhile looking at the status of its announcements affecting retail banking regulation.

Whether the changes are because of negotiations with industry or as a concession that the law won’t get through the Senate, they need to be factored in to forward business planning.

Some changes are proposed in stages but the second stage reforms won’t be announced until the first stage is completed, for example privacy and data breaches.

Other changes are proposed for 3 years’ time. They assume the current government will still be there or that a new government will agree with the changes.

In recent weeks the Government has abandoned the Emissions Trading Scheme and dropped business phone numbers from eligibility for listing in the Do Not Call Register.

The Government’s Henry Tax Review response of 2 May turned out to be an anti-climax: even though it has important changes for superannuation and company tax (assuming the Resources Super Profits Tax is passed), the opportunity to also make compliance improvements has been deferred. Perhaps they will be announced in the Budget on 11 May.

The Future of Financial Advice reform package will have a significant impact on financial institutions and planners if it is implemented in its current form.

Here’s a timetable of changes based on current announcements and laws as passed:

1 July 2010

  • Australian Consumer Law – unfair contract terms law commences
  • National Credit Code commences;
  • Suitability assessments required for loans by lenders which are not ADI’s or Registered Finance Corporations
  • Applications for Australian Credit Licences open for existing consumer lenders (applications close 31 December 2010)

Second half of 2010 (likely)

  • Bankruptcy amendment increasing the minimum amount for which a creditor can petition for bankruptcy from $2,000 to $10,000
  • Extension of Do Not Call Register to emergency service, fax, other non-business and government numbers. Australian business phone numbers will not be covered by the Register.
  • Phase 2 Consumer Credit reform to commence: including a review of credit card limit extension offers, the provision of credit for small businesses, regulation of investment loans other than margin loans and mortgages for residential investment properties and enhancements to the regulation and tailored disclosure of reverse mortgages.

1 January 2011

  • Responsible lending starts for all lenders (including ADI’s and registered finance corporations) starts.
  • Margin lender licensing transition period ends
  • Commencement of new privacy credit reporting laws: reporting will be allowed for repayment history information from 14 April 2010.
  • introduction of a Paid Parental Leave scheme.
  • Changes to ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations commence covering reporting on board diversity and executive remuneration
  • Small business unfair dismissal rules will only apply to businesses with less than 15 employees by individual head count (as opposed to less than 15 full time equivalent employees until then). Employees of a small business will only be able to claim for unfair dismissal after they have been employed for at least 12 months. To dismiss someone fairly after 12 months the employer will have to comply with a Fair Dismissal Code for Small Business.
  • Australian Consumer Law Stage 2: includes a new national legislative scheme for consumer product safety

May 2011

  • New Personal Property Securities law commences.

First half 2011

  • A new national business names registration system
  • mandatory data breach notification decision likely

1 July 2012
Financial adviser commission reforms begin.

2013
Superannuation and company tax reforms commence.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 9th May 2010 by David Jacobson in Compliance
« Newer PostsOlder Posts »