feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Archived Posts Lists

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Personal Property Securities Australia
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Wills, Trusts, Super
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

April 7, 2009

Financial Ombudsman Service outlines policy on parallel proceedings

The Ombudsman's Banking & Finance – Bulletin 61 outlines the Ombudsman's position on some useful practical issues including when financial service providers must respond to requests for information from third parties and chargeback case studies.

Of particular interest is the Ombudsman's policy regarding legal proceedings running parallel to the complaints process:

Once a dispute has been lodged with our office, the financial services provider should not commence legal proceedings against its customer in respect of the same subject matter.

As a member of FOS, the member consents to FOS being the forum for consideration of a matter brought by its customer that falls within the FOS Terms of Reference.

If proceedings are commenced by a financial services provider after FOS has received a dispute, the financial services provider must discontinue the proceedings at its own cost.

If proceedings are issued by the financial services provider after the dispute is received by FOS and before we have informed the financial services provider that we have received the dispute, the issue of whether this is at the cost of the financial services provider will be considered on a case by case basis.

UPDATE: Customers in Financial Difficulty (factsheet)

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted 7th April 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal