feedSubscribe to our news feeds
Langes Sites

Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
Australian Technology and IP Business
Credit Union and Mutual Law
National Consumer Credit Reform
Longview Business Insights
Australian Private Health Insurers
Mutuals Resource Centre

Resources

Commonwealth legislation
Corporate Governance
Not-for-Profit links
Regulator Links

December 29, 2009

External dispute resolution scheme changes

Following the release by ASIC in May 2009 of revised regulatory guides on dispute resolution schemes (RPG 139 and RPG 165) new dispute resolution “compensation caps” under which all EDRs will be able to hear claims up to the value of $500,000 will commence on 1 January 2010, even though the amount of compensation they can award is less.

From 1 January 2012, EDR schemes will only be allowed to limit (cap) the maximum amount of compensation payable per claim to a minimum of $280,000 (or $150,000 if the claim relates to an insurance broker) with the ability to opt for a higher figure in the rules of the scheme.

See Table 2 here for details of the transition for each EDR scheme.

The Terms of Reference for the Financial Ombudsman Service have changed.

Disputes lodged with it on or after 1 January 2010 will be considered under the 2010 Terms of Reference.

Its maximum amount of compensation for banking and finance and mutuals claims will remain at $280,000 until 1 January 2012.

Disputes lodged with the Financial Ombudsman Service before 1 January 2010 will continue to be considered under the previously applicable Terms of Reference.

Posted 29th December 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal

Financial Ombudsman case studies

The Financial Ombudsman’s latest eNews contains some helpful case studies including its approach to customers in financial difficulty (here), credit card charge backs and whether a stockbroker had a reasonable basis for its advice to consumers to invest in a scheme.

Posted 29th December 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal, Risk management

APS 120 securitisation transition

ADI’s which established securitisation arrangements under old APS 120 (Prudential Standard APS 120 Funds Management
and Securitisation made on 30 May 2006 which has been revoked since 31 December 2007) must complete the transition to new APS 120 by 30 June 2010.

If APRA allowed a lower capital requirement or compliance with the old standard that exemption must expire by 30 June 2010. If the arrangement does not comply by 30 June then APRA will impose a higher capital requirement or the ADI can re-document the arrangement so that it does comply with APS 120.

Langes can assist ADI’s with assessing compliance with APS 120.

Posted 29th December 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal, Risk management

December 28, 2009

AML compliance report 2009 guidelines

Austrac has released an Instruction Guide and a sample AML/CTF Compliance report 2009 due to be lodged with Austrac between 1 January and 31 March 2010 for the 2009 calendar year.

In particular Austrac asks whether an independent review of your AML/CTF program was conducted by an external party. Langes can assist you with this.

Posted 28th December 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal

December 23, 2009

AMInstitute Mutual ADI Directors’ Compliance Manual

The Australasian Mutuals Institute (AMInstitute) Mutual ADI Directors’ Compliance Manual is maintained by Langes+ for the exclusive use of AMInstitute members.

The Manual covers 53 areas of law and topics of interest for AMInstitute members.

Langes+ keeps the Manual up-to-date.

The Manual is available only from AMInstitute. Download order form.

Posted 23rd December 2009 by David Jacobson in Credit unions, Legal, Mutuals, Risk management

December 22, 2009

APRA discussion paper on Basel II Framework

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released for consultation a discussion paper, accompanied by proposed amendments to relevant prudential standards and prudential practice guides (PPGs), on proposals to enhance the Basel II Framework in Australia.

The consultation package is a response to measures released in July 2009 by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to enhance the Basel II Framework by ensuring that the risks inherent in banks' portfolios relating to trading activities, securitisations and exposures to off-balance sheet vehicles are better reflected in minimum capital requirements, risk management practices and accompanying public disclosures.

The proposed changes to prudential standards outlined in APRA's discussion paper include:

  • higher capital requirements to capture the credit risk of complex trading activities and the introduction of a stressed value-at-risk (VaR) requirement;
  • higher risk-weights for so-called 'resecuritisation' exposures to better reflect the risk inherent in these products, and increased credit conversion factors for short-term liquidity facilities provided to off-balance sheet conduits;
  • guidance in relation to valuation practices and capture of off-balance sheet and securitisation activities; and
  • increased disclosure requirements for securitisations and off-balance sheet exposures.

Posted 22nd December 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal, Risk management

December 18, 2009

APRA liquidity update

In its letter to ADI’s dated 18 December, APRA has advised that as a result of changed Basel Committee liquidity proposals and timetable, APRA will not finalise its changes to prudential standards on liquidity until the middle of 2011.

Posted 18th December 2009 by David Jacobson in Risk management

December 17, 2009

Mortgagee sale update: Kravchenko v The Rock Building Society

In Kravchenko v The Rock Building Society[2009] VSCA 292 the Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal decided that the mortgagee breached its statutory duty to the mortgagor in selling a residential property owned by the mortgagor to an employee of its solicitors, even though another solicitor in the firm worked on the sale.

The Building Society had advertised the sale by auction and had obtained valuations but as there was little interest it accepted an offer by the solicitor before the auction was held.

Even though the price obtained was within the range of values within which the property would be likely to sell, the mortgagee failed to discharge its duty to the mortgagor.

His insider status was not negated because another solicitor in the firm worked on the sale. It afforded peculiar advantages and presented the potential for conflict of interest…. the purchaser knew, in effect, the reserve and the mortgagee knew what the purchaser was prepared to pay. In such circumstances, although the appellant discontinued his claim against the purchaser and sought only damages from the mortgagee, the identity of the purchaser was relevant to both the onus of proof and the sufficiency of the steps taken to protect the mortgagor’s interests and obtain the best price.

The Building Society was ordered to pay $60,000 damages to the mortgagor.

Posted 17th December 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal

Langes compliance assurance package

We have launched our new compliance assurance website to support our assurance package.


Our package combines independent compliance reviews (including AML, FSR, Credit Code and Privacy) with national support from our 3 state locations and website to provide:

  • New legislation and case alerts;
  • Draft documents;
  • Template policies and checklists;
  • Telephone and email support for clarification of compliance material that we issue;
  • Advice on how breaking and on-going issues affect you;
  • Project management extranet to store and retrieve our assurance reports;
  • Meetings focused on topical issues.

If you would like to discuss our services contact David Jacobson, Patrick Dwyer or Shannon Adams.

Posted 17th December 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal

December 13, 2009

Negotiating new or varied remuneration arrangements by ADI’s: compliance with APS 510

Although the remuneration changes to APRA APS 510 do not commence until 1 April 2010, in APRA's response to submissions it says it expects immediate compliance:

it is APRA’s expectation that regulated institutions negotiating or renegotiating contracts between the release of the revised governance standards (1 December 2009) and their commencement date will be fully cognisant of APRA’s requirements and will begin the transition during this period for existing arrangements that would not meet the revised standards. Any attempts to circumvent APRA’s requirements during this time will expose the relevant institution to a supervisory response from APRA.

Contracts in force at 1 April 2010 must be fully compliant with the standards at the first opportunity for renegotiation, and in any event by 31 March 2013.

If you don't have a contracts register now is the time to set it up.

It is important to note the wide scope of the persons to whom the standard applies to:

  • responsible persons (excluding responsible auditors and non-executive directors);
  • risk management, compliance, internal audit and financial control personnel (collectively, ‘risk and financial control personnel’); and
  • all other employees or agents for whom a significant portion of total remuneration is variable and determined by performance measures. A person need not be an employee of the regulated institution to be covered, and may be an employee of a subsidiary or otherwise related company, a consultant, a contractor or an agent. It can cover persons such as commissioned sales personnel and third party intermediaries such as agents, loan brokers, insurance brokers and financial planners.

Langes Lawyers have prepared an APS510 remuneration checklist. LCAP Members can download it here.

Contact us if you need assistance with drafting or reviewing your agreements or developing your Remuneration Committee charter or remuneration policy.

Posted 13th December 2009 by David Jacobson in Legal, Risk management
Older Posts »